Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4956939 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:12:49 +0100 Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id d1so1339798qca.2 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:18:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=gTPXrH9Mp0GaCZ8wP/hFI0OoAOI3HfJSbNRjhSGk1To=; b=Omh7JDDXCW70EaYGE9ZuPBBkPUiiK0O7BhreNm5AXf092ZW6vMPsqwyXM/DABIkD6s S3d6HAc/NU73KjB4ixlOzmOXAO09PkusqKN9O13b4tjm2NvRRmMr6HBe/6eLrRlnepEw URPFW905NQO5/CW+nhw/Wzs9+3hPRu/mFg+Lt75/kpNSPWTM8gA03BGVc84CKHvG1cEe tUvtInwyfpMT0MmLdBy1zcDPWVvVjNjHENsssdkA27vJJnzpFSrBW8X1iKKfxgzqpXYA G8PFJIHjEF1jJq2lEHm20bITCMrykx/S0BU6OuxJDUCgkiBiX0UKRIlf4s3sAxSIsqa8 l6Iw== X-Received: by 10.224.31.196 with SMTP id z4mr378595qac.20.1358914696108; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:18:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.22] (cpe-24-90-203-116.nyc.res.rr.com. [24.90.203.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v10sm12594330qaa.15.2013.01.22.20.18.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:18:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? References: From: Rendernyc Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-0458204D-37F8-489D-9B94-5418708C2C48 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:18:11 -0500 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-0458204D-37F8-489D-9B94-5418708C2C48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Definitely looks like a stereo rig Interesting idea. Makes me physically sick to watch.=20 On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: > How do they do it on live sports where they have only two angles and do th= is perfect dolly from one angle to the other. It's impressive. >=20 > Jack Tunnicliffe > Java Post Production >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer wrote: >=20 >> I agree. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles toget= her all Wang Chung style,=20 >> then ran the whole thing through Twixtor. i would bet on it. >>=20 >> patrick siemer >> tapeandglue.com >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote: >>=20 >>> I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras=20 >>> I looked frame to frame no ghosting=20 >>> Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't=20 >>>=20 >>> C >>>=20 >>> Sent from Chris's iPhone >>>=20 >>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton wrote:= >>>=20 >>>> it's reminiscent of Wang Chung. >>>>=20 >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE >>>>=20 >>>> -Rob >>>> On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: >>>>> If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think th= ere are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :) >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick wrote: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dplayer_embedded&v=3DHJEahE-4j= uQ >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I'm guessing it is done with frame blending and time remapping of st= ill images. Not great, but at least different. >>>>>> =20 >>>>>> Rick Emery >>>>>> www.rickemery.com >=20 --Apple-Mail-0458204D-37F8-489D-9B94-5418708C2C48 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Definitely looks like a stereo rig

Interesting idea. Makes me physically sick to watch.&n= bsp;

On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe <jack@javapost.ca> wrote:

How do they do it on live sports where they have only t= wo angles and do this perfect dolly from one angle to the other. It's impres= sive.

Jack TunnicliffeJava Post Production

=


On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer <siemer@gmail.com> wrote:

I agree. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles togethe= r all Wang Chung style, 
then ran the whole thing through Twixtor. &= nbsp;i would bet on it.

patrick siemer
tapeandglue.com


On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote:
=
I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras 
I looked frame to frame no ghosting 
Some small bits do cro= ss fade, but the main interest doesn't 

C
<= br>Sent from Chris's iPhone

On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Rober= t Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:

=20 =20 =20 it's reminiscent of Wang Chung.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE

  -Rob
On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote:
If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :)




On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick <= a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:

I'm guessing it is done with frame blending  and time= remapping of still images.  Not great, but at least different.
 


=20

= --Apple-Mail-0458204D-37F8-489D-9B94-5418708C2C48--