Return-Path: Received: from [208.97.132.119] (HELO homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4958351 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:03:02 +0100 Received: from homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D15525C06B; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:08:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=influxx.com; h=references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; q=dns; s= influxx.com; b=lYlAg96UIAyZGUzyrlNif0vO0WGp9/a+HpYh3ZSFAP/MKgjcG bZocS+AhJl6OaNujSrAAheocEBJpg58hk95kyNT2xbzSLVQKY3q1gNt+NUNM4ayl KMt0XvVpqYp5Ok1b+M/KnY0nqX5unR3jN1mBY/BUjId45npgmdvp1w/KzU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=influxx.com; h=references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; s=influxx.com; bh=4M5CCi85kWf0bp9Id1E0VEEriXw=; b=ji7lwPNgr1G/p2VqLcR8YGUXPMtT 1OH2k3pyswIsZGbw24RL/3wPMcweQOcxrhYyMUr9kFPilxLLCrwrvjLRGv8toyxH hezyOIiBexCKLAp/7/Q5UgT3TCSIj8EiMqgJfelFZtt+XfG19PO2TtjKV2sTq5Eg 42Z6FZSjj18lRMI= Received: from [192.168.1.75] (76-206-254-56.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.206.254.56]) (Authenticated sender: adam@influxx.com) by homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0E58E25C06A; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:08:29 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5E006828-26CF-465A-836D-144584262FF8 Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) From: Adam Mercado Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:08:28 -0800 To: After Effects Mail List --Apple-Mail-5E006828-26CF-465A-836D-144584262FF8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To me it looks like they used alternating frames from two different cameras,= perhaps one of those stereoscopic set ups. I didn't notice much frame blend= ing on my phone. Maybe it's more apparent on a bigger screen. The flickering= between alternate viewpoint is an interesting technique.=20 Sent from the ubiquitous Apple communication device I like to call Boris. He= nce the brevity and poor spelling.=20 On Jan 22, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Rick wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dplayer_embedded&v=3DHJEahE-4juQ >=20 > I'm guessing it is done with frame blending and time remapping of still i= mages. Not great, but at least different. > =20 > Rick Emery > www.rickemery.com --Apple-Mail-5E006828-26CF-465A-836D-144584262FF8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To me it looks like they used alternat= ing frames from two different cameras, perhaps one of those stereoscopic set= ups. I didn't notice much frame blending on my phone. Maybe it's more appar= ent on a bigger screen. The flickering between alternate viewpoint is an int= eresting technique. 

Sent from the ubiquitous Apple communicatio= n device I like to call Boris. Hence the brevity and poor spelling. 

On Jan 22, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dplayer_embedded&v=3DHJ= EahE-4juQ

I'm guessing it is done with frame blending  and t= ime remapping of still images.  Not great, but at least different.
 
= --Apple-Mail-5E006828-26CF-465A-836D-144584262FF8--