Return-Path: Received: from [208.97.132.83] (HELO homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4958359 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:05:52 +0100 Received: from homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1E0208071; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:11:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=influxx.com; h=references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; q=dns; s= influxx.com; b=YEdV3l9jHOic/q5ilhGAVfyZ/DxKy+3jms/QQCoMWt94Zh38B Nil4vRZgwYSwJN/9N7JswnJrsFO0JfDFmTTtWUDGd3tdG2a6lH9ka6KG0vSchItu 5xZXSvWVsvAg2l0r9a+TDpoQIrDoyq+t7rVf22BEyUmfagFqXxHlKbxbK8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=influxx.com; h=references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; s=influxx.com; bh=DMBZk22o8ih+zRvywomex6TM9mY=; b=DG1YlgdEYDHY7p0nJ/18yOZh0sJO MKpwy3Db9L1EntGMNK7ixJCM4TVkIDAhUs5LchVRFmVa5HyoTnBdEcwMw9bPXqF7 5Ub1msEBZYS8OqIrOFlNywzL9uwUfIL95ws7euAB19hM5vVYCkYE9ym01dWfdS+Z SRgXpPFIqbsUuII= Received: from [192.168.1.75] (76-206-254-56.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.206.254.56]) (Authenticated sender: adam@influxx.com) by homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DA26B208070; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:11:19 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-23460968-0A12-4811-BEC6-1EAD4E809895 Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) From: Adam Mercado Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:11:20 -0800 To: After Effects Mail List --Apple-Mail-23460968-0A12-4811-BEC6-1EAD4E809895 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As usual I'm a day late to this party. At least my guess ws in line with the= concensus Sent from the ubiquitous Apple communication device I like to call Boris. He= nce the brevity and poor spelling.=20 On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Enrique Gamez wrot= e: > You've just witnessed the "Unsteady Cam" in action! > -e >=20 > From: Rendernyc > Reply-To: After Effects Mail List > Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:18 PM > To: After Effects Mail List > Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? >=20 > Definitely looks like a stereo rig >=20 > Interesting idea. Makes me physically sick to watch.=20 >=20 > On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: >=20 >> How do they do it on live sports where they have only two angles and do t= his perfect dolly from one angle to the other. It's impressive. >>=20 >> Jack Tunnicliffe >> Java Post Production >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer wrote: >>=20 >>> I agree. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles toge= ther all Wang Chung style,=20 >>> then ran the whole thing through Twixtor. i would bet on it. >>>=20 >>> patrick siemer >>> tapeandglue.com >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras=20 >>>> I looked frame to frame no ghosting=20 >>>> Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't=20 >>>>=20 >>>> C >>>>=20 >>>> Sent from Chris's iPhone >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton wrote= : >>>>=20 >>>>> it's reminiscent of Wang Chung. >>>>>=20 >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE >>>>>=20 >>>>> -Rob >>>>> On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: >>>>>> If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think t= here are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick wrote: >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dplayer_embedded&v=3DHJEahE-4= juQ >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I'm guessing it is done with frame blending and time remapping of s= till images. Not great, but at least different. >>>>>>> =20 >>>>>>> Rick Emery >>>>>>> www.rickemery.com --Apple-Mail-23460968-0A12-4811-BEC6-1EAD4E809895 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As usual I'm a day late to this party.= At least my guess ws in line with the concensus

Sent from the ubiqui= tous Apple communication device I like to call Boris. Hence the brevity and p= oor spelling. 

On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Enrique Game= z <enrique0210@sbcglobal.net= > wrote:

You've just= witnessed the "Unsteady Cam" in action!
-e

<= span style=3D"font-weight:bold">From: Rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com>
Reply-To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:18 PM
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this?

Definitely looks like a stereo r= ig

Interesting idea. Makes me physically sick to wa= tch. 

On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe <jack@javapost.ca> wrote:

How do they do it on live sports where they have= only two angles and do this perfect dolly from one angle to the other. It's= impressive.
<= span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: separate; -webkit-= border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; color:= rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; f= ont-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-heigh= t: normal; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; text-indent: 0px; -webk= it-text-size-adjust: auto; text-transform: none; orphans: 2; white-space: no= rmal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; ">
Jack Tunnicliffe

Java Post Production




On Jan 2= 2, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer <= siemer@gmail.com> wrote:

I agree. they had two= camera angles on each shot. edited the angles together all Wang Chung style= , 
then ran the whole thing through Twixtor.  i would bet on i= t.

patrick siemer


On J= an 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote:

I think the= y may have morphed between the 2 cameras 
I looked frame to f= rame no ghosting 
Some small bits do cross fade, but the main= interest doesn't 

C

Sent from Chris's i= Phone

On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com> wrote:

=20 =20 =20 it's reminiscent of Wang Chung.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE

  -Rob
On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote:
If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :)




On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick <= a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:

I'm guessing it is done with frame blending  and time= remapping of still images.  Not great, but at least different.
 


=20

= --Apple-Mail-23460968-0A12-4811-BEC6-1EAD4E809895--