Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f51.google.com ([209.85.128.51] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4958462 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:02:28 +0100 Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 6so625753qea.10 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:07:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=ct0hA2ZngfZiadSLh6zUnQAFYZF95wNVW2uUzbX6y+c=; b=rwciX2jHiA6tsZyHpJ/O3b81i/K8IQj40JxEUaQEQaOXkhERMoipFODVQeyHZZbeBq w1ncxSgsyn7qxS5xeCKoHgCbWjFY4rRnKSc/20uBCKYbyrIPFCE4sin9SyknRnTrHn1b 0x20v1J/8HVdJNg8StkWHLSzUygKtIP8bFCIyxUtCr2GBf1sRMEkS9nlUa80Qhd9YHoE TBnzUnKRSQFB3G//yR6FLq33dF8lQzVQ8OdHsRAiUMK3OB/KyyOcrVTs9nH6a8aD74uf aokaCqCJ35zIp67+YVpAlSsWTxblZfmpDLfwtW3sAvCpC+S7ew1sQ8D2BFhOkQSjtPjv 0lsQ== X-Received: by 10.229.179.23 with SMTP id bo23mr510258qcb.104.1358960876070; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:07:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.106.226 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:07:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:07:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502bd2448283204d3f7bc7f --00504502bd2448283204d3f7bc7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 well for the "3d" motion effect they used during the superbowl for the huge angle swings on kickoffs etc, I'm pretty sure they had multiple cameras, like over ten. For live regular NFL games I think it's a live processing effect for broadcast like twixtor on steroids. Many of the cameras are also speed about on ziplines above the action, running in hi-speed so they can pull down to slo mo for a huge angle switch also, yeah, headache inducing. reminds me of those "3d" animated gifs whoa.gif On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: > How do they do it on live sports where they have only two angles and do > this perfect dolly from one angle to the other. It's impressive. > > Jack Tunnicliffe > > Java Post Production > > > > > On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer wrote: > > I agree. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles > together all Wang Chung style, > then ran the whole thing through Twixtor. i would bet on it. > > patrick siemer > tapeandglue.com > > > On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote: > > I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras > I looked frame to frame no ghosting > Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't > > C > > Sent from Chris's iPhone > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton wrote: > > it's reminiscent of Wang Chung. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoXu6QmxpJE > > -Rob > On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: > > If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there > are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :) > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick wrote: > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HJEahE-4juQ >> >> I'm guessing it is done with frame blending and time remapping of >> still images. Not great, but at least different. >> >> Rick Emery >> www.rickemery.com >> > > > > > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --00504502bd2448283204d3f7bc7f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable well for the "3d" motion effect they used during the superbowl fo= r the huge angle swings on kickoffs etc, I'm pretty sure they had multi= ple cameras, like over ten. For live regular NFL games I think it's a l= ive processing effect for broadcast like twixtor on steroids. Many of the c= ameras are also speed about on ziplines above the action, running in hi-spe= ed so they can pull down to slo mo for a huge angle switch

also, yeah, headache inducing. reminds me of those "3d&= quot; animated gifs



On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe <jack@javapost.ca>= ; wrote:
How do they do it on live sports where = they have only two angles and do this perfect dolly from one angle to the o= ther. It's impressive.

Jack Tunnicliffe

Java Post Production




On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer <siemer@gmail.com> wrote:
I agre= e. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles together all = Wang Chung style,=A0
then ran the whole thing through Twixtor. =A0i would bet on it.
<= br>
patrick siemer


On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote:

I think they may have morphed between = the 2 cameras=A0
I looked frame to frame no ghosting=A0
Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't=A0

C

Sent from Chris's iPhone

On = Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com> wrote:

=20 =20 =20 =20 it's reminiscent of Wang Chung.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE

=A0 -Rob
On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote:
If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :)




On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com= > wrote:

I'm guessing it is done with frame blending =A0and time remapping of still images. =A0Not great, but at least different.
=A0


=20




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--00504502bd2448283204d3f7bc7f--