Return-Path: Received: from atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com ([209.17.115.50] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4967466 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:02:35 +0100 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r14N8KVT000616 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:08:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 12260 invoked by uid 0); 4 Feb 2013 23:08:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.7?) (chris@chriszwar.com@60.225.197.206) by 0 with ESMTPA; 4 Feb 2013 23:08:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: [AE] Supressing Check for Updated Footage From: Chris Zwar In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:41:07 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9C138E4C-D3A5-4E14-A09A-51AFF33A98CE@chriszwar.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) On 05/02/2013, at 9:30 AM, Todd Kopriva wrote: > We are treating 3D workflows very seriously Oooh I hope this means proper native EXR support! I watched the AE anniversary video yesterday and was interested to hear = Dan say that the addition of 16bit went a long way towards giving AE = credibility. These days nothing makes the Nuke guys at work more = dismissive of AE than the way it handles / doesn't handle EXRs. Proper = native support for multi-channel EXRs and cropping will again go a long = way towards giving AE "credibility". (sorry to drift OT)=