Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4967495 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:24:02 +0100 Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z13so8750075iaz.2 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:29:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :references:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=sbEbsSMbzE/usWLEm5XPQ3h/sj/jvcEzyr+gAPCYZoI=; b=GVILVI5x8+Q8MCm6DR7RT04JQZ0enJ3n0Ef2oPN/Y+iZDc0v4qPg9McQzMXIk+E2x4 Lngn1gRu3cFAvd8X2/e7A78Fx5ukZSsIPoyjneJPeRFm0KqCaUJ+vK1hW6NNstrPFbG8 svU7KPb6DmIwkh0ZpvUxDREIgFW69C90e5b6AdfpiQhN/2Q9Brt8SkL50hiLFhxlt6/s o9LdBlXlDxXTAoFHjo7vsl5UJbrmzOhysCHxOn6WPzeBXGlIkWfcS3uK8cf7RdMHQ+yO iqk3wg75BSufUgUJ6xUI56jnf6rFqrzC7MoN/nMOXJLjGJkKIAjNZLdCY87WOP8EWVdr ONEw== X-Received: by 10.50.108.145 with SMTP id hk17mr9714006igb.51.1360020592204; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:29:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.244] (c-71-63-186-29.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [71.63.186.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fa6sm19004669igb.2.2013.02.04.15.29.50 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:29:51 -0800 (PST) From: Carey Dissmore Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_028CC2D4-C496-4060-8D9D-FBF83D5F101A" Message-Id: <55ABD272-56C8-4A45-9405-2AB769A14C4E@imugonline.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: [AE] OT Mac Pro related, not good news Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:29:49 -0600 References: To: "After Effects Mail List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmIaMObD9QanjvuKzuehF4KZDrG3Apkd5e/0NlF+CiQcPleJn6O3+ZKH+JA2Mt5DCmvucZ3 --Apple-Mail=_028CC2D4-C496-4060-8D9D-FBF83D5F101A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 While Apple have indicated they're going to do something...I'm just not = confident it will be all that compelling for a user like me, given what = I know about chipset development combined with Apple's clear design and = engineering trends. ...so this one appears driven by regulatory requirements the current = model doesn't meet and not having anything new to ship at this time.=20 carey On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Robert Houghton wrote: > Not sure if anyone's caught this. >=20 > = http://www.macrumors.com/2013/01/31/apple-to-halt-mac-pro-sales-in-europe-= effective-march-1-over-regulatory-requirements/ >=20 > Not the best news if you're across the pond and have been waiting = for an update to the Mac Pro. >=20 > -Rob >=20 --Apple-Mail=_028CC2D4-C496-4060-8D9D-FBF83D5F101A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 While Apple have indicated they're going to do something...I'm just not confident it will be all that compelling for a user like me, given what I know about chipset development combined with Apple's clear design and engineering trends.

...so this one appears driven by regulatory requirements the current model doesn't meet and not having anything new to ship at this time.

carey

On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Robert Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com> wrote:

Not sure if anyone's caught this.

http://www.macrumors.com/2013/01/31/apple-to-halt-mac-pro-sales-in-europe-effective-march-1-over-regulatory-requirements/

Not the best news if you're across the pond and have been waiting for an update to the Mac Pro.

-Rob

--Apple-Mail=_028CC2D4-C496-4060-8D9D-FBF83D5F101A--