Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4968124 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:56:11 +0100 Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b25so118267qca.31 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:02:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0h/6bnZeZaCiALigoKQe/kV6Za4EGvKyq3x4iXvK978=; b=fudtkbnGZiKRWb3h/GbKY1kZlbEsidDECnxEpeZbAU52S0ar7rcWfKKVeyHFfP91Kc JPVcNmWY26QW9AKD6oex8c1PDL4zYlwIkhrcZHzDY0NB8jv1K19N8xvENhXfOOsuTXwe KZepmBsirBcBrcTXoWd1sqlblFPlUa6WH7TdWgH5JnzJXT4vFxluwt0dLRUQM874ABWL HuRduIl2rqhA6rWl+3mxw1aElEE+NQsXVznDuQsd0DQeskJ8NWQjjlE+Fdr7T8ydAJ7X 91fxC7B7yDEbOCvolMnhCmlOui1ZyEcyCEpG0RczKpdt7leQEHaO9iKcmPdUHCu8ILDk kt9g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.52.68 with SMTP id h4mr19390868qag.17.1360080122823; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.106.226 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.106.226 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:02:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:02:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] OT Mac Pro related, not good news From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074afa896425804d4fc5450 --20cf3074afa896425804d4fc5450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That is pretty nuts. I have stuck my fingers in a running cpu fan by accident before. Didn't even break the skin. And those run at much higher rpm than any case fans. Nanny state indeed... On Feb 5, 2013 10:09 AM, "Scott Carmichael" wrote: > From what I have read, is that the part of the legislation that Apple has > decided to pull the Mac Pro over has to do with fans. I guess all fans i= n > computers MUST have guards over them, whether they are accessible from th= e > outside or not. BEcause so many people open the computer while running a= nd > stick there finger in the fans=85.. So in order to continue to sell the= mac > pro , the would need to put guards over all the internal fans. Since the > mac pro is on it's last leg anyway, they don't want to incur the expense = of > redesigning the the old chassis. > > I still think we will see a replacement near the end of the year, whether > it will be a full blown tower, who knows. > > Scott > > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Carey Dissmore wrote: > > While Apple have indicated they're going to do something...I'm just not > confident it will be all that compelling for a user like me, given what I > know about chipset development combined with Apple's clear design and > engineering trends. > > ...so this one appears driven by regulatory requirements the current mode= l > doesn't meet and not having anything new to ship at this time. > > carey > > > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Robert Houghton wrote: > > Not sure if anyone's caught this. > > > http://www.macrumors.com/2013/01/31/apple-to-halt-mac-pro-sales-in-europe= -effective-march-1-over-regulatory-requirements/ > > Not the best news if you're across the pond and have been waiting for > an update to the Mac Pro. > > -Rob > > > > --20cf3074afa896425804d4fc5450 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That is pretty nuts. I have stuck my fingers in a running cp= u fan by accident before. Didn't even break the skin. And those run at = much higher rpm than any case fans. Nanny state indeed...

On Feb 5, 2013 10:09 AM, "Scott Carmichael&= quot; <sacarmic@indiana.edu&= gt; wrote:
From what I have read, is that the part= of the legislation that Apple has decided to pull the Mac Pro over has to = do with fans. =A0I guess all fans in computers MUST have guards over them, = whether they are accessible from the outside or not. =A0BEcause so many peo= ple open the computer while running and stick there finger in the fans=85..= =A0So =A0in order to continue to sell the mac pro , the would need to put = guards over all the internal fans. =A0Since the mac pro is on it's last= leg anyway, they don't want to incur the expense of redesigning the th= e old chassis.

I still think we will see a replacement near the end of the = year, whether it will be a full blown tower, who knows.=A0

Scott


On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:29= PM, Carey Dissmore <carey@imugonline.com> wrote:

While App= le have indicated they're going to do something...I'm just not conf= ident it will be all that compelling for a user like me, given what I know = about chipset development combined with Apple's clear design and engine= ering trends.

...so this one appears driven by regulatory requirements the= current model doesn't meet and not having anything new to ship at this= time.=A0

carey



On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Robert Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com>= wrote:

=20 =20 =20
Not sure if anyone's caught this.

http://www.macrumors.com/2013/01/31/apple-to-halt-mac-pro-sales-in-europe-e= ffective-march-1-over-regulatory-requirements/


=A0=A0=A0 Not the best news if you're across the pond and have been waiting for an update to the Mac Pro.

=A0=A0=A0 -Rob



--20cf3074afa896425804d4fc5450--