Return-Path: Received: from atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com ([209.17.115.46] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4969438 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:50:39 +0100 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob08.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r16KuXTj020090 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:56:33 -0500 Received: (qmail 29153 invoked by uid 0); 6 Feb 2013 20:56:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.7?) (chris@chriszwar.com@60.225.197.206) by 0 with ESMTPA; 6 Feb 2013 20:56:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: [AE] SD pixel blur? From: Chris Zwar In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:56:23 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) On 07/02/2013, at 3:51 AM, Chris Meyer wrote: > Reduce Interlace Flicker behaves just like Fast Blur set to Vertical. I have always wondered about this. I assumed as much because the effect = is so old, but I think there was a 3rd party interlace flicker fixer = that used a high-pass filter so that only the flickery bits were = blurred- which is what I would hope for from a dedicated filter for = interlace flicker. It would be nice if the AE reduce interlace flicker = was a bit more intelligent and didn't simply blur everything, but it = would be nicer still if I never had to work with fields ever again.