Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4973097 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:15:17 +0100 Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n11so4444811vch.5 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:21:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=cJLr026yRJE14vvSCqQ9d7HzWc4qxKkAQYXGqjQcidM=; b=j46c4xjy0GGVMnPD68AdNRTQTLKAdYEIutDJw0wTUPW6LTacfZK0xNvpStMeK2vuPp aJqLAEFr4Ip4PyM8sUQfc14Z4n06nnmEleUTafq+QwbhyME5Vy+TJR3LrYBrApSIG5UE AbZUx4O6xOcLuNlmK33MdlNIFsEivbXIDneWheLYiyRgbOTPW9FSxpplSzeVenj1Id5O G9DAbtigx1HyWzStYD7/VUUlsdxi15OIX5iAB3p0m6BSqpYsA4kUx/jlUwYCE2BLN83O azIfpyrBxnGvoonGduCsc77/1Giz253fnRqHK7tFCE7HlibYecSJIg/Xfw2d+vB4LhjG 1pXg== X-Received: by 10.52.19.239 with SMTP id i15mr2523052vde.47.1360664481823; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:21:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.241.161 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:21:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Kjettrup Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:21:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] ProRes file authoring in Windows (SOLUTION) To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3078114c18fcf304d5846356 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmD/opXYOd28ZHhHOWRat8xzlXd+5qb0LnabaW9lwBeq9OiouRtPDvMIh6jO6sg4IrrJWjd --20cf3078114c18fcf304d5846356 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i also installed the Cinec software here some days ago and wasn't too impressed with the results. The application sometimes glues to the cursor if you use a Wacom, i guess thats because of the weird way he has done the application framing/border, it is not a standard windows framing. I couldn't output either DNxHD or XD CAM HD files, only Prores could be encoded, but thats also the main reason for people to be interested in this= . And it only supports 2 cpu processors? So it is alot slower than AnotherGUI (that also uses the same ffmpeg prores encoder) a 30sec spot was encoded in about ~22sec in Cinec if i remember correctly (still faster than realtime) and it took about 3-4 sec in AnotherGUI. Maybe i have installed a newer version of ffmpeg that has a multithreaded Prores encoder to use with AnotherGUI? I have a problem with both solutions, that they both sometimes add a few extra frames to the file, just ~3 blank frames in the end. This can sometimes be a problem, sometimes it doesn't matter :-) http://www.stuudio.ee/anothergui/ - Robert 2013/2/12 Jon Messeri > I installed and tried the Cinec software this past weekend. Impressed so > far; haven=92t had any issues. Anyone else encounter anything weird?**** > > ** ** > > Cheers, Jon**** > > ** ** > > *From:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] *On > Behalf Of *Joe Stern > *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2013 6:44 PM > *To:* After Effects Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [AE] ProRes file authoring in Windows (SOLUTION)**** > > ** ** > > Just saw this today via doddle.com:**** > > ** ** > > > http://news.doddleme.com/blogs/post-production/free-windows-video-encorde= r-supports-prores-and-other-pro-formats/ > **** > > ** ** > > Joe Stern**** > > CNN Post Production**** > > Atlanta**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Feb 11, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Tim Sassoon wrote:**** > > > > **** > > So you're 8-bit limited.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Tim Sassoon**** > > SFD**** > > Santa Monica, CA**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Greg Balint wrote= : > **** > > > > **** > > I render my masters at QuickTime - PhotoJpeg - 98% quality**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > --20cf3078114c18fcf304d5846356 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i also installed the Cinec software here some days ago and= wasn't too impressed with the results.
The application sometimes g= lues to the cursor if you use a Wacom, i guess thats because of the weird w= ay he has done the application framing/border, it is not a standard windows= framing.
I couldn't output either DNxHD or XD CAM HD files, only Prores cou= ld be encoded, but thats also the main reason for people to be interested i= n this.
And it only supports 2 cpu processors? So it is alot slow= er than AnotherGUI (that also uses the same ffmpeg prores encoder) a 30sec = spot was encoded in about ~22sec in Cinec if i remember correctly (still fa= ster than realtime) and it took about 3-4 sec in AnotherGUI.
Maybe i have installed a newer version of ffmpeg that has a multithrea= ded Prores encoder to use with AnotherGUI?
I have a problem with both solutio= ns, that they both sometimes add a few extra frames to the file, just ~3 bl= ank frames in the end. This can sometimes be a problem, sometimes it doesn&= #39;t matter :-)



- Robert


2013/2/12 Jon Messeri = <jon.ifms@gmail.= com>

I installed and tried the Cinec software this past weekend. Impressed so= far; haven=92t had any issues. Anyone else encounter anything weird?

=A0

Che= ers, Jon

=A0

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Jo= e Stern
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 6:44 PM
To: After Effects = Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] ProRes file authoring in Windows (SOL= UTION)

=A0

=A0=

On Feb 11, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Tim Sassoon <tsassoon@aol.com>= ; wrote:



So you'= ;re 8-bit limited.

=A0

=A0

Tim Sass= oon

SFD

Santa Monica, C= A

=A0

=A0

=A0=

On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Greg Balint <delrazoraelist@gmail.com= > wrote:



=

I render my masters at QuickTime - PhotoJpeg - = 98% quality

=A0

=A0


--20cf3078114c18fcf304d5846356--