Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4974417 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:15:10 +0100 Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r4so228878iaj.34 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:21:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vKJfGDV6cOSLkWsR9hyjVOqjFNAE2+nqzrS6KN0n0rs=; b=M+arroUarUwoTy8cXI69FAqPrII+4bdawq+Ij1RKJuJmsHr22PecWNjP8MkxzHHxQj WpA/W28SpJHhJ1E5tOqgQB2MmEeB74mcZi9Bk7ygxVFvDgHl1/h3njWQHWDpLp2AM6qx k7unUmD04VTHZQWEB/sh3oMqFvsifRqOQG4icVbRQwNFCxq5xcwnrLXj472Mqc5A4Uqj 9eG3FA+YiKtPQ9mZmVdce/NfSD6m5BW3YrV3jHtXKsHHrx//1ZVx4m77FIchy1pIbzJ1 PGfsHVbMnULOv7/2JiTjwKkbl94hL0GId+dosj3bUANOxF1pLAh+QsqgQ4fvE1m9HKh5 taWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.47.170 with SMTP id e10mr4358320ign.84.1360686075588; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.131.202 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:21:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:21:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Scaling up SD to HD in Premiere From: Todd Kopriva To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All of the details are here: http://blogs.adobe.com/premierepro/2010/10/scaling-in-premiere-pro-cs5.html On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Jonathan Penzner wro= te: > According to what I've read on the list, scaling footage up in Premiere i= s > better than scaling in AE or FCP. Is the quality dependent on the graphic= s > card? Or is it software-based? For the job I'm working on now, speed isn'= t > important =96 quality is paramount, and my graphics card is o l d . . .= .