|
|
| I just did a quick look on ebay and there's one for $250. That's a pretty inexpensive way to get into Cuda. Works great for me in AE for Cuda on Sapphire, Monster, etc, too.
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/2nd-Gen-Mac-Pro-nVidia-GeForce-GTX285-1GB-Video-Card-/270676286549#ht_3254wt_1303
Jack TunnicliffeJava Post Production 402, 2206 Dewdney ave. Regina, SK Canada S4R 1H3 P. 306-777-0150 cell. 306-536-4321 www.javapost.ca ______________
On Feb 12, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Jonathan Penzner <sureal@charter.net> wrote: Thanks, Bruce.
Any suggestions for a CUDA card? I'm running Snow Leopard in a MacPro3,1 Tower. I'm not crazy about upgrading to Mountain Lion as I still use FCP and Color. Color breaks with 10.7 and above, I believe. I've been wanting to move to Da Vinci but the $1,000 is a hurdle I can't jump over right now. Anyway, it's late, been working all day and I'm losing my mind.
Thanks also to Brian Klein for the tip about the high quality check box.
Jonathan
On Feb 11, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Bruce Wainer wrote: I don't know the names of the algorithms off the top of my head, but here's the order of scaling quality: After Effects, regardless of hardware, is lowest Premiere Pro without a CUDA-enabled video card (so running in software only mode) Premiere Pro with a suitable CUDA card, either directly supported or manually added to the PP list
So use Premiere Pro, but you'll get better quality (and more speed) by adding a new(ish) video card.
According to what I've read on the list, scaling footage up in Premiere is better than scaling in AE or FCP. Is the quality dependent on the graphics card? Or is it software-based? For the job I'm working on now, speed isn't important – quality is paramount, and my graphics card is o l d . . . .
Many thanks in advance.
Jonathan
JONATHAN PENZNER
SUNDANCE/REALTIME VIDEO EDITING • MOTION GRAPHICS • DESIGN
| STUDIO 626 345-0285 | | CELL 818 321-2890 |
|
|