Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4980046 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:30:56 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id o13so1890301qaj.12 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:37:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MPFQNLGjcOYH9U5nLs/4Nl3NsZtRLnaVGA4OG9ZKrV0=; b=mKRu7mawcPf3cWJwdAwuqu1xHZF3KKALAVHwJVua86cIBCS7OEnylbulTzivxSZUET 6O2zAIk/k/xW4+KWZUluwD5oogOdYGRuyuW1cQTMvY9su66RzPBmCnGooiIGxCuGwkh6 78z4u9HS0VHyUjlGzdetJPnZcJcGlrtQKS322F7PrikPTyecPhL+OfZqLtFYHFq9cM3b 1A/Ycqbd+MYCG/DTEbfEckTEMFdhbM0ITQugxQkCNdhphYDFpPYVBvalNAe0a5B2ymEQ O6HSBOMql5TkC6GKXgvou/iT2DNnsFRfd8iGugrS51xHJutR0WhwcA4h3ABFBFRAGVUJ OGKg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.96.234 with SMTP id dv10mr7275013qeb.48.1361288234939; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:37:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.106.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:37:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:37:14 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] New Video Board? From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb0464aae343004d6159d51 --047d7bb0464aae343004d6159d51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Similar situation for the 690 vs 680. A lot more expensive for not a whole lot more bang, unless you are pushing millions of polys in maya / zbrush or have a gaming addiction (guilty). Its also a pretty big power suck, drawing around 300 watts i think? it means you need at least a 1000 watt psu. Furthermore, while the 680 / 690 do support four monitors, the 3gb gtx 580 (which only supports two simultaneous) actually has 150% of the CUDA performance of the 6xx series, due to nvidia gimping the Cuda processing in favor of quadro line. It's also even cheaper, although hard to find. On Tuesday, February 19, 2013, Evan Fotis wrote: > cost effective big time at the moment unless money is no issue at all. > On 19-Feb-13 16:57, Angie-Taylor wrote: > >> And please remind me, why choose i7 over Xeon? >> > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7bb0464aae343004d6159d51 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Similar situation for the 690 vs 680. A lot more expensive for not a whole = lot more bang, unless you are pushing millions of polys in maya / zbrush or= have a gaming addiction (guilty). Its also a pretty big power suck, drawin= g around 300 watts i think? it means you need at least a 1000 watt psu.=A0F= urthermore, while the 680 / 690 do=A0support four monitors, the 3gb gtx 580= (which only supports two simultaneous)=A0actually has 150% of the CUDA per= formance of the 6xx series, due to nvidia gimping the Cuda processing in fa= vor of quadro line. It's also even cheaper, although hard = to find.=A0

On Tuesday, February 19, 2013, Evan Fotis wrote:

cost effective big time at the moment unless money is no issu= e at all.
On 19-Feb-13 16:57, Angie-Taylor wrote:

And please remind me, why choose i7 over Xeon?

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv&g= t;

--
Animator &= Editor
www.teddygage.com=
Brooklyn

--047d7bb0464aae343004d6159d51--