Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f48.google.com ([209.85.128.48] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4980141 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:27:44 +0100 Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 3so3129246qea.35 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:34:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=ys2PaDK4Y3/O/hpmi1H+Mazp/07yX6ARhlWRRCTeJyI=; b=AazitSoAXxlBYOqzIkOw1rJV4Fvilg/ozisNymE02TrQ4MDOf67q1cVAWzd5RNdSh7 ubI7hBSWkogtXT/9aj4+wlRGm0frqXzWqa7rKaFLs0iYAuTDXuOwqaHbrWy6pS+rXTTL lmkhth4lFgl9QfOA+Tq3rpB7Tz7sIYBIQdUvwAO5+5g44hvkUkved71j5moNQpWfKhJ8 XGd9j4zkORRbD+LvOGjP0ajv65atqSMlMQv9urNpmFez1vZAvqNBmWbENbySYnj0upHb dH/SaZJIcyFMIZgqxsRBuiynr8rUy0O33DQFNweqmEN+01bak8kcNh45LNQsQ3yxnVLr Kt2g== X-Received: by 10.224.111.134 with SMTP id s6mr7962886qap.4.1361291642841; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:34:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.106.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:33:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:33:22 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] New Video Board? To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074b1a0cea95404d61668c6 --20cf3074b1a0cea95404d61668c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 And then, of course, nvidia releases the GTX Titan today. $1000 single-card processing faster than a 690. Definitely wonder what kind of CUDA performance this thing has. Ever since I saw a Maximus setup doing realtime fluid sim calculations I've been waiting for it to come within consumer pricing. This is no Maximus, but tempting, depending on AE/PP/3D performance... http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/nvidia-gtx-titan-announce/ On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Brian Maffitt wrote: > I had forgotten how much I missed three monitors until I got the 690. It's > so useful to have my Wacom 22HDHD set up as a separate desktop and not > mirrored to another monitor. It came in really handy this weekend when I > had an impossible turnaround for a demanding client, and needed all of the > real estate I could get. > > Brian > > > Similar situation for the 690 vs 680. A lot more expensive for not a whole > lot more bang, unless you are pushing millions of polys in maya / zbrush or > have a gaming addiction (guilty). Its also a pretty big power suck, drawing > around 300 watts i think? it means you need at least a 1000 watt > psu. Furthermore, while the 680 / 690 do support four monitors, the 3gb gtx > 580 (which only supports two simultaneous) actually has 150% of the CUDA > performance of the 6xx series, due to nvidia gimping the Cuda processing in > favor of quadro line. It's also even cheaper, although hard to find. > > On Tuesday, February 19, 2013, Evan Fotis wrote: > >> cost effective big time at the moment unless money is no issue at all. >> On 19-Feb-13 16:57, Angie-Taylor wrote: >> >>> And please remind me, why choose i7 over Xeon? >>> >> >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >> > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > > > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --20cf3074b1a0cea95404d61668c6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And then, of course, nvidia releases the GTX Titan today. $1000 single-card= processing faster than a 690. Definitely wonder what kind of CUDA performa= nce this thing has. Ever since I saw a Maximus setup doing realtime fluid s= im calculations I've been waiting for it to come within consumer pricin= g. This is no Maximus, but tempting, depending on AE/PP/3D performance...
http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/19/nvidia-gtx-titan-announce/
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Brian Maffitt= <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote:
I had fo= rgotten how much I missed three monitors until I got the 690. It's so u= seful to have my Wacom 22HDHD set up as a separate desktop and not mirrored= to another monitor. It came in really handy this weekend when I had an imp= ossible turnaround for a demanding client, and needed all of the real estat= e I could get.

Brian


Similar situation for the 690 vs 680. A lot more expensive for not a= whole lot more bang, unless you are pushing millions of polys in maya / zb= rush or have a gaming addiction (guilty). Its also a pretty big power suck,= drawing around 300 watts i think? it means you need at least a 1000 watt p= su.=A0Furthermore, while the 680 / 690 do=A0support four monitors, the 3gb = gtx 580 (which only supports two simultaneous)=A0actually has 150% of the C= UDA performance of the 6xx series, due to nvidia gimping the Cuda processin= g in favor of quadro line. It's also even cheaper, althoug= h hard to find.=A0

On Tuesday, February 19, 2013, Evan Fotis wrote:
cost effective big time at the moment unless money is no issu= e at all.
On 19-Feb-13 16:57, Angie-Taylor wrote:
And please remind me, why choose i7 over Xeon?


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv&g= t;


--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com<= /span>
Brooklyn





--
Animator & Edi= tor
<= a href=3D"http://www.teddygage.com" target=3D"_blank">www.teddygage.com=
Brooklyn
--20cf3074b1a0cea95404d61668c6--