| Jonathan Try the lite version of DaVinci-it does 90% of what the full version does and will get you up to speed on the work flow.
As for FCP, I still use it and it works fine with ML. Color thats another story-I can try opening it tomorrow and see if it works...
Tom
On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Penzner wrote: Thanks, Bruce.
Any suggestions for a CUDA card? I'm running Snow Leopard in a MacPro3,1 Tower. I'm not crazy about upgrading to Mountain Lion as I still use FCP and Color. Color breaks with 10.7 and above, I believe. I've been wanting to move to Da Vinci but the $1,000 is a hurdle I can't jump over right now. Anyway, it's late, been working all day and I'm losing my mind.
Thanks also to Brian Klein for the tip about the high quality check box.
Jonathan
On Feb 11, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Bruce Wainer wrote: I don't know the names of the algorithms off the top of my head, but here's the order of scaling quality: After Effects, regardless of hardware, is lowest Premiere Pro without a CUDA-enabled video card (so running in software only mode) Premiere Pro with a suitable CUDA card, either directly supported or manually added to the PP list
So use Premiere Pro, but you'll get better quality (and more speed) by adding a new(ish) video card.
According to what I've read on the list, scaling footage up in Premiere is better than scaling in AE or FCP. Is the quality dependent on the graphics card? Or is it software-based? For the job I'm working on now, speed isn't important – quality is paramount, and my graphics card is o l d . . . .
Many thanks in advance.
Jonathan
JONATHAN PENZNER
SUNDANCE/REALTIME VIDEO EDITING • MOTION GRAPHICS • DESIGN
| STUDIO 626 345-0285 | | CELL 818 321-2890 |
|
