Return-Path: Received: from [74.125.149.76] (HELO na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 4990238 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:41:56 +0100 Received: from mail-qa0-f69.google.com ([209.85.216.69]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob106.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUTDp7aJyefVWI8i3GjnLAaxW96f1pFKB@postini.com; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:48:35 PST Received: by mail-qa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id bv4so5500457qab.0 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:48:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=totaltraining.com; s=google; h=x-received:x-received:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer; bh=xypUWau4aioAGttpNA1DCBVJGBIu67JEvxw80h2pnjM=; b=t09XQQtHNU0lPN7A9wKFpf50/gAuXY/4YM0nJvkgnYFRni0WvwB9T9WaxLZpeSiiv0 a6ZgPzdy0Bl9e6emNZTHe+HCHYNFuPUejoKtnWVj/NuS8na0VoYsntDCyX1/yKsM1QRD Gv+czl8kjAG1t2DcTEd9B1UKoakvH4Ah5u7/U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=xypUWau4aioAGttpNA1DCBVJGBIu67JEvxw80h2pnjM=; b=dauYOmlfvsQdnlbu5unujtg7SCuz+N9qjHS2ZkiupZAmHvkKliu+vi5B+y1eKazs4s kHb+NCLeEUGxS2a5tKYuMOgRCX/azIVZV40ReD8zJX9YnhKiewDGVb5fJHm9aSg8+GK5 Sklzfje24+lTBRQiPRb05Gao+u+oZz3HFDGu9cJbam47z53D+rBIQFQ0oai8XsMzOm6x LKuWeikeCjr/HnMdDLG4jJG2fkNbGw5J7UBetfsZTM8wCT6oYpjv8rNbm450UDUc85mr MQ0Z6ljXQSbLV6zrG0XPGifHDpBUu0iEEvJGcfZ+JQwp9s09366Mp4cFjvUFpriOHgis BP/Q== X-Received: by 10.49.58.173 with SMTP id s13mr3548632qeq.29.1362160109257; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:48:29 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.58.173 with SMTP id s13mr3548626qeq.29.1362160109178; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:48:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from macintosh-5.home (pool-108-29-120-46.nycmny.fios.verizon.net. [108.29.120.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fr4sm21114399qab.3.2013.03.01.09.48.26 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:48:27 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Maffitt Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C04FC3EF-FC35-47B4-83A8-C69A0B8DE4F6" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] Wacom Cintiq 22HD Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:48:25 -0500 References: To: "After Effects Mail List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLcB4drkKfiURGmoE+jDoo/9UWcmMV58FQ6TW+aOSRN5shqWO906N3zEp8rlzIpD87ABFzxeXgT8flP85MIkiDQ/8v577X5h2DOg/gJ/UALW86kdwReQCFyEgEyXDuXwVt99LJuvbJedw6OgiWdbecSlrIdMNY4VoM7RtwwMiU+dewiP0= --Apple-Mail=_C04FC3EF-FC35-47B4-83A8-C69A0B8DE4F6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 The Ergo stand looks really nice, and the 24" also has touch = interaction, which the 22HD does not. I admit I think the touch features = might be useful, but the 24" wasn't a shipping option when I got the = 22". But yeah, $600 is a big difference. I do find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for video work, and it = has the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish it were = easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically when I'm not using = it as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, but it feels precarious, = and I don't want the thing to topple over and break. Brian > It's not worth the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD right? = I think that would be too big for my workspace anyway, but I do like the = ergo stand for it. After the 12wx I think anything is going to feel = enormous anyway. That thing is tiny. >=20 > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian Maffitt = wrote: > I do, it's pretty awesome, and doubles as a nice extension to my = desktop when I'm not using the tablet. >=20 >=20 >> Anyone use one of these? Thinking of upgrading my trusty cintiq12WX >>=20 >> --=20 >> Animator & Editor >> www.teddygage.com >> Brooklyn >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn --Apple-Mail=_C04FC3EF-FC35-47B4-83A8-C69A0B8DE4F6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1

I do = find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for video work, and it has = the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish it were = easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically when I'm not using = it as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, but it feels precarious, = and I don't want the thing to topple over and = break.

Brian

It's not = worth the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD right? I think = that would be too big for my workspace anyway, but I do like the ergo = stand for it. After the 12wx I think anything is going to feel enormous = anyway. That thing is tiny.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian = Maffitt <brian@totaltraining.com> = wrote:
I do, it's pretty awesome, and = doubles as a nice extension to my desktop when I'm not using the = tablet.


Anyone use one of these? Thinking of upgrading my trusty = cintiq12WX

--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--
Animator & = Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn

= --Apple-Mail=_C04FC3EF-FC35-47B4-83A8-C69A0B8DE4F6--