Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4990252 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:50:33 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id bv4so5236375qab.10 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:57:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=opVzZ0YzoAg95zPcc5D4PqONTRsQFp7yZJPJQOMZMyw=; b=ymTADubnn5iKR9tEwOO54L1T0FYvayGGXOJbKbsTTUm83nT3omVfHyFyKxIRRKxDEv lY0aYDWtRq7P0je8i3zUpDKBQs01SFRGVVAILrAJBuzUv2J17hTHvJ65f8LyoExlMIxk dUmzpaqlGuKPhv9T9P34IYuJaGVxVsXPcoozymw//iw9Rdj15EhA8s6uizgQpkCFpIah zAN4KdHvqnhVPBZ+6g08tsac1wl1EZyiCGjHxms/LlXqmaKTHaHK+9WaWYO0zYABRHcH e+Q58lUH4vX0Fz7C4xEAwrew9ONJfv4BeLDQF2hdignn7PAbLdQy2CQO7naajuDmjRSB dP5A== X-Received: by 10.229.244.38 with SMTP id lo38mr4040880qcb.107.1362160631507; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:57:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.106.226 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:56:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:56:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] Wacom Cintiq 22HD To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045013dfa9193c904d6e0bc5b --005045013dfa9193c904d6e0bc5b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 sadly I think the touch / multitouch options are another cool thou for the 24HD Touch, on top of the 600 premium for the "regular" 24HD 1920x1200. it would be pretty awesome for 3d sculpting (rotate model as you paint, etc) but I don't do enough zbrush to justify it. yet. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Brian Maffitt wrote: > The Ergo stand looks really nice, and the 24" also has touch interaction, > which the 22HD does not. I admit I think the touch features might be > useful, but the 24" wasn't a shipping option when I got the 22". But yeah, > $600 is a big difference. > > I do find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for video work, and it > has the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish it were > easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically when I'm not using it > as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, but it feels precarious, and I > don't want the thing to topple over and break. > > Brian > > > It's not worth the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD right? I > think that would be too big for my workspace anyway, but I do like the ergo > stand for it. After the 12wx I think anything is going to feel enormous > anyway. That thing is tiny. > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian Maffitt wrote: > >> I do, it's pretty awesome, and doubles as a nice extension to my desktop >> when I'm not using the tablet. >> >> >> Anyone use one of these? Thinking of upgrading my trusty cintiq12WX >> >> -- >> Animator & Editor >> www.teddygage.com >> Brooklyn >> >> >> > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > > > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --005045013dfa9193c904d6e0bc5b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable sadly I think the touch / multitouch options are another cool thou for the = 24HD Touch, on top of the 600 premium for the "regular" 24HD 1920= x1200. it would be pretty awesome for 3d sculpting (rotate model as you pai= nt, etc) but I don't do enough zbrush to justify it. yet.=A0

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Brian Maffi= tt <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote:
The Ergo stand looks really nice, = and the 24" also has touch interaction, which the 22HD does not. I adm= it I think the touch features might be useful, but the 24" wasn't = a shipping option when I got the 22". But yeah, $600 is a big differen= ce.

I do find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for v= ideo work, and it has the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish = it were easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically when I'm = not using it as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, but it feels precari= ous, and I don't want the thing to topple over and break.

Brian


It's not wor= th the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD right? I think that woul= d be too big for my workspace anyway, but I do like the ergo stand for it. = After the 12wx I think anything is going to feel enormous anyway. That thin= g is tiny.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian Maffi= tt <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote:
I do, it's pretty awesome, and doub= les as a nice extension to my desktop when I'm not using the tablet.


Anyone use one of these? Thin= king of upgrading my trusty cintiq12WX

--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--
Animator & Editor
= www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--
Animato= r & Editor
www.teddyg= age.com
Brooklyn
--005045013dfa9193c904d6e0bc5b--