Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4990280 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:13:22 +0100 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u7so1474743wey.37 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:20:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-tagtoolbar-keys:content-type; bh=snUX94B5I+dfFp13pTLKu8sEF5DTtVvwFRhIMIw67LE=; b=L5V0ydWV0TYMvDIo3HKZh39Bhoywhrah27Wzdlp1q3T8z8QZ6RA84K2lJptJyC22dI EyB2UKvIieYbe+b7/aMkc3pA25mNOxASoUJJeH99w4MekHmQuMdNliYZYlsKoVjfh3K1 /aq6+fv0W/ONffkMm/DuZDz8PHZGn6C0bDyqxe48+4aUMTNYq9GsjSSiZPHO8v0A8J/v RKgdZuqoLEVH4oaMTPJFn2biXI6AL/nXI8JuuW2gvUIcgJ/vSxNcqWAFCt6MhH6sn+Q5 KGWOZmkjlRussV6h+P9uPJ8vzJXNmAVh9TKRcR9p4FM72TCGxcO1DT6kZQQikfboxAPW Kskw== X-Received: by 10.194.242.163 with SMTP id wr3mr19226635wjc.35.1362162001628; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:20:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.5] (cust-233-240.on4.ontelecoms.gr. [92.118.233.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm23772561wib.11.2013.03.01.10.19.59 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:20:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5130F1C0.9000402@gmail.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Evan Fotis Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:21:52 +0200 From: Evan Fotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] Wacom Cintiq 22HD References: In-Reply-To: X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130301202152534 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070300030507020909030406" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070300030507020909030406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit For what its worth, you can now find a refurb 21UX directly from Wacom at around $1K half price that is. Its rez @1600x1200 instead of 1920x1080 of the 22HD but i find the vertical space more useful when drawing. On 01-Mar-13 19:56, Teddy Gage wrote: > sadly I think the touch / multitouch options are another cool thou for > the 24HD Touch, on top of the 600 premium for the "regular" 24HD > 1920x1200. it would be pretty awesome for 3d sculpting (rotate model > as you paint, etc) but I don't do enough zbrush to justify it. yet.� > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Brian Maffitt > > wrote: > > The Ergo stand looks really nice, and the 24" also has touch > interaction, which the 22HD does not. I admit I think the touch > features might be useful, but the 24" wasn't a shipping option > when I got the 22". But yeah, $600 is a big difference. > > I do find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for video work, > and it has the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish it > were easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically when > I'm not using it as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, but it > feels precarious, and I don't want the thing to topple over and break. > > Brian > > >> It's not worth the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD >> right? I think that would be too big for my workspace anyway, but >> I do like the ergo stand for it. After the 12wx I think anything >> is going to feel enormous anyway. That thing is tiny. >> >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian Maffitt >> > wrote: >> >> I do, it's pretty awesome, and doubles as a nice extension to >> my desktop when I'm not using the tablet. >> >> >>> Anyone use one of these? Thinking of upgrading my trusty >>> cintiq12WX >>> >>> -- >>> Animator & Editor >>> www.teddygage.com >>> Brooklyn >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Animator & Editor >> www.teddygage.com >> Brooklyn > > > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn --------------070300030507020909030406 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit For what its worth, you can now find a refurb 21UX directly from Wacom  at around $1K half price that is. Its rez @1600x1200 instead of 1920x1080 of the 22HD but i find the vertical space more useful when drawing.
On 01-Mar-13 19:56, Teddy Gage wrote:
sadly I think the touch / multitouch options are another cool thou for the 24HD Touch, on top of the 600 premium for the "regular" 24HD 1920x1200. it would be pretty awesome for 3d sculpting (rotate model as you paint, etc) but I don't do enough zbrush to justify it. yet.�

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Brian Maffitt <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote:
The Ergo stand looks really nice, and the 24" also has touch interaction, which the 22HD does not. I admit I think the touch features might be useful, but the 24" wasn't a shipping option when I got the 22". But yeah, $600 is a big difference.

I do find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for video work, and it has the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish it were easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically when I'm not using it as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, but it feels precarious, and I don't want the thing to topple over and break.
Brian


It's not worth the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD right? I think that would be too big for my workspace anyway, but I do like the ergo stand for it. After the 12wx I think anything is going to feel enormous anyway. That thing is tiny.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian Maffitt <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote:
I do, it's pretty awesome, and doubles as a nice extension to my desktop when I'm not using the tablet.


Anyone use one of these? Thinking of upgrading my trusty cintiq12WX

--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn

--------------070300030507020909030406--