Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4990294 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:23:56 +0100 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id k14so2705577wer.39 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:30:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-tagtoolbar-keys:content-type; bh=WxuZaM++vNZdrSuOBdl/ejkdI7Rf70OO6y4dNmJUiOY=; b=S9dZG2VhlOhxhTcEg/Ajq5QK3Xr/qOxJuXUrtYHduDlAfhejTZ8aLqttP7Zv9VVTYl 963glMFL9Ajlst8nNUPGpzA2y+NfGbY97+W+cPFYz4oUJ+d1IOlEM41FhCk0b61kVAHB kLLS2wRn9fbRSygunTXKQAEV6vfT3fryUXdKMzIdHAaX/zswqEtLZVo0C2bmr5Q8bGco 2DqaHQwgth4xyKeVi8+HJ3u5ka1Ef90bfyywnXRszNBz+EZWMvOU/22Cwdi7EmHfYxgk pPUCudrR7RQm+h0IkR/ODF46frntfFWDkna2nmbkDQ79t8H8Cv8PL/dfEH9Izjpn+8Ii +V0g== X-Received: by 10.180.75.110 with SMTP id b14mr41434035wiw.21.1362162634822; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:30:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.5] (cust-233-240.on4.ontelecoms.gr. [92.118.233.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ed6sm23832553wib.9.2013.03.01.10.30.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:30:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5130F43A.4030103@gmail.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Evan Fotis Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:32:26 +0200 From: Evan Fotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] Wacom Cintiq 22HD References: In-Reply-To: X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130301203226196 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090008060203020503010906" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090008060203020503010906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I dothought feel that from the current products the 22HD sits in the sweet spot. With the extra 600 of the 24HD I'd get a large intuos or another monitor. I've also used the DIY wiimote touch project for presentations and crude pentouch stuff which works well when all set up, in small monitors its very good, in larder displays it needs two wiimotes, and it dislikes too much ambient light. btw have you seen this airtouch? http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mQkKyOOyLSs On 01-Mar-13 20:21, Evan Fotis wrote: > For what its worth, you can now find a refurb 21UX directly from > Wacom at around $1K half price that is. Its rez @1600x1200 instead of > 1920x1080 of the 22HD but i find the vertical space more useful when > drawing. > On 01-Mar-13 19:56, Teddy Gage wrote: >> sadly I think the touch / multitouch options are another cool thou >> for the 24HD Touch, on top of the 600 premium for the "regular" 24HD >> 1920x1200. it would be pretty awesome for 3d sculpting (rotate model >> as you paint, etc) but I don't do enough zbrush to justify it. yet.� >> >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Brian Maffitt >> > wrote: >> >> The Ergo stand looks really nice, and the 24" also has touch >> interaction, which the 22HD does not. I admit I think the touch >> features might be useful, but the 24" wasn't a shipping option >> when I got the 22". But yeah, $600 is a big difference. >> >> I do find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for video work, >> and it has the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish >> it were easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically >> when I'm not using it as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, >> but it feels precarious, and I don't want the thing to topple >> over and break. >> >> Brian >> >> >>> It's not worth the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD >>> right? I think that would be too big for my workspace anyway, >>> but I do like the ergo stand for it. After the 12wx I think >>> anything is going to feel enormous anyway. That thing is tiny. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian Maffitt >>> > wrote: >>> >>> I do, it's pretty awesome, and doubles as a nice extension >>> to my desktop when I'm not using the tablet. >>> >>> >>>> Anyone use one of these? Thinking of upgrading my trusty >>>> cintiq12WX >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Animator & Editor >>>> www.teddygage.com >>>> Brooklyn >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Animator & Editor >>> www.teddygage.com >>> Brooklyn >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Animator & Editor >> www.teddygage.com >> Brooklyn > --------------090008060203020503010906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I dothought feel that from the current products the 22HD sits in the sweet spot. With the extra 600 of the 24HD I'd get a large intuos or another monitor.

I've also used the DIY wiimote touch project for presentations and crude pentouch stuff which works well when all set up, in small monitors its very good, in larder displays it needs two wiimotes, and it dislikes too much ambient light.

btw have you seen this airtouch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mQkKyOOyLSs


On 01-Mar-13 20:21, Evan Fotis wrote:
For what its worth, you can now find a refurb 21UX directly from Wacom  at around $1K half price that is. Its rez @1600x1200 instead of 1920x1080 of the 22HD but i find the vertical space more useful when drawing.
On 01-Mar-13 19:56, Teddy Gage wrote:
sadly I think the touch / multitouch options are another cool thou for the 24HD Touch, on top of the 600 premium for the "regular" 24HD 1920x1200. it would be pretty awesome for 3d sculpting (rotate model as you paint, etc) but I don't do enough zbrush to justify it. yet.�

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Brian Maffitt <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote:
The Ergo stand looks really nice, and the 24" also has touch interaction, which the 22HD does not. I admit I think the touch features might be useful, but the 24" wasn't a shipping option when I got the 22". But yeah, $600 is a big difference.

I do find the 1920 x 1080 22HD screen very useful for video work, and it has the best color of any of my current monitors. I wish it were easier/safer to orient the monitor totally vertically when I'm not using it as a tablet. I can prop the back legs up, but it feels precarious, and I don't want the thing to topple over and break.
Brian


It's not worth the extra $600 to go up to the 1920 x 1200 24HD right? I think that would be too big for my workspace anyway, but I do like the ergo stand for it. After the 12wx I think anything is going to feel enormous anyway. That thing is tiny.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Brian Maffitt <brian@totaltraining.com> wrote:
I do, it's pretty awesome, and doubles as a nice extension to my desktop when I'm not using the tablet.


Anyone use one of these? Thinking of upgrading my trusty cintiq12WX

--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn


--------------090008060203020503010906--