Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4994277 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:20:33 +0100 Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b4so4859727qen.32 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:27:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=y6bxyzHGHd+BxWGhjOo7gcF9N+bTs5DUlwbxdArBo4g=; b=iAajRIsjNGW+y+ae9Q4mrwcNtjyw+bjMtQXq5VJolKh7Aip9lTg4ICPwZ6ML3C0gbv +c7qWvkyjOIqhm862+82OvAUmab9hG1dqLlV8exX0JzKA+aHpwqyLx8NpY+cyNYsx+5Q LBWG4WwOXJ2fpM3igUVekDZY+DN7au2Xg6Fgbr5L1B2x0ehI/dRK+wkffDn0hXmDq4pG +oyNGDg5pEqSXbAASrWhbaRdd38JQABqjrRIcM7PgnPvY49lumifApju3GbD9v1IVLZW akQ3DtuFhwHZvjeLZDEba+2eq5kCNZr1VQsDzP3SfmPXRQF0eYL6Qv3bojum7rjpLeYf jSxQ== X-Received: by 10.49.26.35 with SMTP id i3mr42908795qeg.12.1362504438785; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:27:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.127.143 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:26:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:26:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Optimizing a 1.5GB AE file To: After Effects Mail List , stephen@sv2studios.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6da20414524304d730c9c1 --047d7b6da20414524304d730c9c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jesus christ. Buy a mainframe from IBM? Honestly the only thing I can think of is to bake the pics from .raw to JPG proxies. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: > I=92ve got a client supplied AE CS6 project file that is 1.5Gb =96 takes = an > hour and half to open. It=92s a 37 minute 4K film that I=92m creating a D= CP. > It=92s already reduced. It=92s created from DSLR pics =96 2.6 TB of RAW f= iles.** > ** > > ** ** > > Any under the hood performance tweaks that might help AE handle the file > better? The render machine I have does not have a SSD unfortunately which > would help a bit with load times it appears the load is mostly checking t= he > 2.6 TB of RAW files.**** > > ** ** > > *stephen van vuuren* > > 336.202.4777**** > > * * > > *http://www.insaturnsrings.com/* > > *http://www.sv2dcp.com/* > > *http://www.sv2studios.com/* > > * * > > *A film is =96 or should be =96 more like music than like fiction. It sho= uld > be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what=92s behind the > emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.* > > =96*Stanley Kubrick***** > > ** ** > --=20 Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7b6da20414524304d730c9c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jesus christ. Buy a mainframe from IBM? Honestly the only thing I can think= of is to bake the pics from .raw to JPG proxies.=A0

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Stephen van Vuuren <st= ephen@sv2studios.com> wrote:

I=92ve got a client supplied AE CS6 proj= ect file that is 1.5Gb =96 takes an hour and half to open. It=92s a 37 minu= te 4K film that I=92m creating a DCP. It=92s already reduced. It=92s create= d from DSLR pics =96 2.6 TB of RAW files.

=A0

Any unde= r the hood performance tweaks that might help AE handle the file better? Th= e render machine I have does not have a SSD unfortunately which would help = a bit with load times it appears the load is mostly checking the 2.6 TB of = RAW files.

=A0

steph= en van vuuren

336.202.4777

=A0

<= b>http://www.insaturnsrings.com/

http://www.sv2dcp.com/

http://www.sv2studios.com/<= /u>

=A0

<= i>A film is =96 or should be =96 more like= music than like fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings.= The theme, what=92s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.=

=96Stanley Kubri= ck

=A0

=



--
= Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--047d7b6da20414524304d730c9c1--