Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4994337 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:54:36 +0100 Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b4so4822461qen.18 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:01:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=sGAjVZbefEITFfOOY5m2XH8r8XYOiIvkLXmchKmkBmI=; b=PtYZbGIe+8kBQn4RXzzPRPJekhZp/1Hf/JTxlhnHcZpXT7oTi4C7BDLdE7uZkLzdiy HXD/YY1upVe6HwZKCLuGK7IFOg7xztjtPt7daSdHIktpkw0MMQ6ErV1rh9+gJ6uKCpTe 6/yIMSChS+r87fR1Q4DcHIWdEgJuLiYdxGPxcIMu5mSw3sOqFlsdAqdxlua4ZR/4kdZn xn46xdiyh5w+z6zuv4CnmwuXbOHqvFjWmRaSnvLhV8UPdMMoCCIMUbL7c0mdDSstYc/l YR5psQE537sHHZYpjdRLIb3oJT6/9y2BAPyhAgAx+H+NQoseqOUF+FYIVL7D62WDAcs6 aBug== X-Received: by 10.49.26.35 with SMTP id i3mr43111183qeg.12.1362506481539; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:01:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.127.143 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:00:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:00:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Optimizing a 1.5GB AE file To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6da204d63e6304d7314226 --047d7b6da204d63e6304d7314226 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable he said the raw files are over 2.5 TB of media. The slowdown probably comes from reading the individual files off your media storage to assemble the sequence. I have run into this problem with sequences, but never on this scale. The SSD wouldn't help much if you only plan on having the project file on it. You'd need a 2.5 TB SSD. Hope the client has a couple hundred thousand dollars on hand... On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Brian Higgins wro= te: > How much media do you have? If you're saying that the project file + > media are 1.5GB, an SSD probably won't help you that much. My guess is > that the long load times are from AE having to process the camera raw fil= es > into usable pixels. Raw flexibility comes with a heavy performance hit! > > > -bH > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Stephen van Vuuren < > stephen@sv2studios.com> wrote: > >> JPG Proxies were used for the assembly/online. But render all have been >> replaced with RAW for a final CC =96 client did that =96 I=92m just doin= g the DCP >> render but have to open/close the file a number of times, save. It takes >> several minutes to save.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I=92m going to do short render test but I=92m thinking of charging the c= lient >> for an SSD drive.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *stephen van vuuren* >> >> 336.202.4777**** >> >> * * >> >> *http://www.insaturnsrings.com/*** >> >> *http://www.sv2dcp.com/* >> >> *http://www.sv2studios.com/* >> >> * * >> >> *A film is =96 or should be =96 more like music than like fiction. It sh= ould >> be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what=92s behind the >> emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.* >> >> =96*Stanley Kubrick***** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] *On >> Behalf Of *Teddy Gage >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:27 PM >> >> *To:* After Effects Mail List >> *Subject:* Re: [AE] Optimizing a 1.5GB AE file**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Jesus christ. Buy a mainframe from IBM? Honestly the only thing I can >> think of is to bake the pics from .raw to JPG proxies. **** >> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Stephen van Vuuren < >> stephen@sv2studios.com> wrote:**** >> >> I=92ve got a client supplied AE CS6 project file that is 1.5Gb =96 takes= an >> hour and half to open. It=92s a 37 minute 4K film that I=92m creating a = DCP. >> It=92s already reduced. It=92s created from DSLR pics =96 2.6 TB of RAW = files.* >> *** >> >> **** >> >> Any under the hood performance tweaks that might help AE handle the file >> better? The render machine I have does not have a SSD unfortunately whic= h >> would help a bit with load times it appears the load is mostly checking = the >> 2.6 TB of RAW files.**** >> >> **** >> >> *stephen van vuuren***** >> >> 336.202.4777**** >> >> * ***** >> >> *http://www.insaturnsrings.com/***** >> >> *http://www.sv2dcp.com/***** >> >> *http://www.sv2studios.com/***** >> >> * ***** >> >> *A film is =96 or should be =96 more like music than like fiction. It sh= ould >> be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what=92s behind the >> emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.***** >> >> =96*Stanley Kubrick***** >> >> **** >> >> >> >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> -- >> Animator & Editor >> www.teddygage.com >> Brooklyn**** >> >> > > > -- > *brian higgins | creative director > Sol Design > 312.706.5500 > higgins@soldesignfx.com > soldesignfx.com > * > > > --=20 Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7b6da204d63e6304d7314226 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable he said the raw files are over 2.5 TB of media. The slowdown probably comes= from reading the individual files off your media storage to assemble the s= equence. I have run into this problem with sequences, but never on this sca= le. The SSD wouldn't help much if you only plan on having the project f= ile on it. You'd need a 2.5 TB SSD. Hope the client has a couple hundre= d thousand dollars on hand...

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Brian Higgi= ns <higgins@soldesignfx.com> wrote:
How much media do you have? =A0If you're saying that the project file += media are 1.5GB, an SSD probably won't help you that much. =A0My guess= is that the long load times are from AE having to process the camera raw f= iles into usable pixels. =A0Raw flexibility comes with a heavy performance = hit!
=A0

-bH

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Stephen van Vuu= ren <stephen@sv2studios.com> wrote:
<= p class=3D"MsoNormal">JPG Proxies were used for = the assembly/online. But render all have been replaced with RAW for a final= CC =96 client did that =96 I=92m just doing the DCP render but have to ope= n/close the file a number of times, save. It takes several minutes to save.=

=A0<= /p>

I=92m going to do shor= t render test but I=92m thinking of charging the client for an SSD drive.

=A0<= /u>

stephen = van vuuren

336.202.4777=

=A0

http://www.insaturnsrings.com/

http://www.sv2dcp= .com/

http://www= .sv2studios.com/

=A0

A film is = =96 or should be =96 more like music than like fiction. It should be a prog= ression of moods and feelings. The theme, what=92s behind the emotion, the = meaning, all that comes later.

=96Stanley Kubrick=

= =A0

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Tedd= y Gage
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:27 PM

<= br>To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] Optimizin= g a 1.5GB AE file

= =A0

Jesus christ. Buy a mainframe from IBM? Honestly the only thing I can think= of is to bake the pics from .raw to JPG proxies.=A0

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at = 12:19 PM, Stephen van Vuuren <stephen@sv2studios.com> wrote:

I=92ve got a client supplied AE CS6 projec= t file that is 1.5Gb =96 takes an hour and half to open. It=92s a 37 minute= 4K film that I=92m creating a DCP. It=92s already reduced. It=92s created = from DSLR pics =96 2.6 TB of RAW files.

=A0

Any unde= r the hood performance tweaks that might help AE handle the file better? Th= e render machine I have does not have a SSD unfortunately which would help = a bit with load times it appears the load is mostly checking the 2.6 TB of = RAW files.

=A0

steph= en van vuuren

336.202.4777

=A0

ht= tp://www.insaturnsrings.com/

http://www.sv2dcp.com/

http://www.sv2studios.com/

=A0

<= i>A film is =96 or should be =96 more like= music than like fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings.= The theme, what=92s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.=

=96Stanley Kubri= ck

=A0

=



=A0

--

Animator & Editor
= www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn




--





-- Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
--047d7b6da204d63e6304d7314226--