Return-Path: <toddkopriva@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 4994373 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:22:20 +0100
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so8344813ieb.29
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:29:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=/TBTL6SsJCWr9VN7r/SKNeQ1SngqKJIMf88Hk4IxZlE=;
        b=W7KMIjyKiL0Wbp3QWe+6iBJ4KYig2t5JjZ8wYqXyw1C6L6/lpI325L7VZoa4BZzdv6
         j6MRWfFNUELRskxr6C4cUX07+9PZxB0btQJMeD4MuA1elK9FtOqneBm15jKJiY+YbEqc
         zZV7ftlqyg0J8HIJNAdeFSq0tj0RXaWLmTg6vjgo1gGMhRWiCy32s/owYdOQ9HQCn9oj
         y7FhGHtLix86Q1a3hJml4e6dsiqnf6n40dY070VRW7PVSUos0BtqDKGWha/rx7sm/Pt9
         K1Jt7C02vbOTLu8SztByiX3bcPhX4RST8+hgqfYeWZ7N0Ss5yQNAqscnqJh8BD7B3Erw
         i9kQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.2.101 with SMTP id 5mr2101108igt.29.1362508144480; Tue,
 05 Mar 2013 10:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.131.202 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:29:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <list-4994264@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-4994264@media-motion.tv>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:29:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CABsSiUywSQ+eOpjmqa9jcCCxdrEy0ZDUUG71eu7hdUEPTvNGiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Optimizing a 1.5GB AE file
From: Todd Kopriva <toddkopriva@gmail.com>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>, stephen@sv2studios.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Does this giant project file use a lot of Warp Stabilizer or 3D Camera
Tracker? There are some tips here for reducing the amount of data
stored in the project file by these effects:
http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/05/memory-and-storage-tips-for-warp-stabilizer-and-3d-camera-tracker.html