Return-Path: Received: from nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com ([17.158.232.236] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5002172 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:40:06 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.68] ([99.152.153.100]) by nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-26.01(7.0.4.26.0) 64bit (built Jul 13 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MJL00MG6VUIFZB0@nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:47:08 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-03-13_07:2013-03-13,2013-03-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1302030000 definitions=main-1303130090 From: Jim Curtis MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CB2BC98D-4ABF-497A-9415-C021F6325881" Subject: Re: [AE] transcoding in AE or Premiere Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:47:06 -0500 In-reply-to: To: After Effects Mail List References: Message-id: <02430218-0630-41E6-A904-E0476486ED8C@me.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) --Apple-Mail=_CB2BC98D-4ABF-497A-9415-C021F6325881 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 8-12 hours sounds wrong. I get fast exports from Pr to H.264. What = settings are you using? One thing I noticed will really slow exports to H.264 is to mess with = the Advanced settings, so I never touch those. =20 And I don't use Format: Quicktime>H.264. Use H.264 under Format. Exporting from Pr or AME is exponentially faster than exporting to = uncompressed or ProRes and transcoding in Squeeze. Squeeze only uses = one or two cores, very inefficiently, whereas Pr and AME max out my 8 = cores during exports. Last week, I tried dragging an Ae comp into Pr (Dynamic Link), and then = used the export settings in Pr, which are more extensive than the Output = Modules in Ae. Worked very well for me. On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Rich Young wrote: > I don't think Adobe is doing GPU encoding yet, or it would appear in = the marketing bullet points (maybe CS Next some time). Sorenson Squeeze = does, and it seems to have a Premiere export plug-in. >=20 > I'm now experiencing serious export slowness in Premiere. I have = Yellow lines in the Sequence and perfect playback, but exporting takes = 8-12 hours to h.264 or QT. Last year for similar material on a similar = computer, it was 1 hour to render h.264 (~ 2-hr event videos). I'm not = sure even magic words by Todd Kopriva will fix this. >=20 > Rich >=20 >=20 > --- On Wed, 3/13/13, Dean Forss wrote: >=20 > Hey folks, >=20 > Does anyone know if/how the GPU is utilized in transcoding files on = output in Premiere or AE with cuda support? In other words are the GPUs = being utilized other than when editing? >=20 > TIA, >=20 > --=20 > Dean Forss > Technology Consultant, 3D Artist, Interactive Designer > Direct 904.557.4189 >=20 > Life is a wondrous adventure; embrace it, leave yesterday behind, take = risks - not to escape today's life, but to prevent it from escaping you! >=20 --Apple-Mail=_CB2BC98D-4ABF-497A-9415-C021F6325881 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 8-12 = hours sounds wrong.  I get fast exports from Pr to H.264. =  What settings are you using?

One thing I = noticed will really slow exports to H.264 is to mess with the Advanced = settings, so I never touch those.  

And I = don't use Format: Quicktime>H.264.  Use H.264 under = Format.

Exporting from Pr or AME is exponentially = faster than exporting to uncompressed or ProRes and transcoding in = Squeeze.  Squeeze only uses one or two cores, very inefficiently, = whereas Pr and AME max out my 8 cores during = exports.

Last week, I tried dragging an Ae comp = into Pr (Dynamic Link), and then used the export settings in Pr, which = are more extensive than the Output Modules in Ae.  Worked very well = for me.



On Mar 13, = 2013, at 10:26 AM, Rich Young wrote:

I don't think Adobe is doing GPU = encoding yet, or it would appear in the marketing bullet points (maybe = CS Next some time). Sorenson Squeeze does, and it seems to have a = Premiere export plug-in.

I'm now experiencing serious export = slowness in Premiere. I have Yellow lines in the Sequence and perfect = playback, but exporting takes 8-12 hours to h.264 or QT. Last year for = similar material on a similar computer, it was 1 hour to render h.264 (~ = 2-hr event videos). I'm not sure even magic words by Todd Kopriva will = fix this.

Rich


--- On Wed, 3/13/13, Dean = Forss <deanforss@gmail.com> = wrote:

Hey folks,

Does anyone know if/how the GPU is utilized in transcoding files on output in Premiere  or = AE with cuda support? In other words are the GPUs being utilized other = than when editing?

TIA,

--
Dean Forss
Technology Consultant, 3D Artist, = Interactive Designer
Direct = 904.557.4189

Life is a wondrous adventure; embrace it, leave yesterday behind, = take risks - not to escape today's life, but to prevent it from escaping = you!

=

=
= --Apple-Mail=_CB2BC98D-4ABF-497A-9415-C021F6325881--