Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5015945 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:37:16 +0100 Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fo13so15748158lab.38 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:44:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=40AVUvemx7A0zuIsNWC3v/iQ2IU8b0L+nU+KOcmO5i4=; b=SyYxZwAy46LWioToI8RsuwwBjDUHia3/TJ6nUEIS7aDBC+XREA+NUlPIEm+AFPyl6b VOyaipcJpu7NKUfUykTt508ycwadMwBBBq9GY7FxRqVtK7fvAxjRhoqBD+od6KGRawUg JuwLKU4hPVOmNYKmpX1FymR+MRzDirlKbND5HNcD4ykRjDGnoHfJCwXLN6yvirMFZkoH EPGzrMD+7IlqXcAhxI+7ZJsWkRssx6rb0efWuiQG3h9JbQQ85VELlX0fpxRJPnhLy2su 3bYT1a3AMGWsqmaci3TxZvfJxQL/PeQT/CbPjPLxTtdLVfhukLacXesns917PpPV6neE is4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.144.105 with SMTP id sl9mr10323201lab.4.1364391883940; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: richatloopcorp@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.26.74 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:44:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:43 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MNlaIgqEVmGNtWpkmbz8l_fuO8o Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Adobe Refine Edge From: Richard Green To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f22c5bd94304f04d8e83da7 --e89a8f22c5bd94304f04d8e83da7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Does it differ from this? http://www.digitalfilmtools.com/powermask/ Seems to use the trimask tech that is being used by that and Topaz Remask in Photoshop -- Cheers Rich www.loopcorp.com --e89a8f22c5bd94304f04d8e83da7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Does it differ from this?


Seems to use the trimask tech that is bein= g used by that and Topaz Remask in Photoshop

--
Cheers --e89a8f22c5bd94304f04d8e83da7--