Return-Path: Received: from p3plwbeout04-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.224] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5027942 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:18:45 +0200 Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.243]) by p3plwbeout04-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id LJSV1l0035FgiYg01JSVXB; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:26:29 -0700 X-SID: LJSV1l0035FgiYg01 Received: (qmail 25915 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2013 18:26:29 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 75.83.121.31 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.6.34 Message-Id: <20130405112628.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.b7232e4edc.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: "Robert W. Walker" To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] After Effects Technology Preview Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:26:28 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 This is a very good question. In one of the 'reveal' videos I viewed,=0Ath= e narrator said that what happens is C4D launches a render instance in=0Ath= e background. That leads me to believe that we are not getting=0AGPU-accel= erated rendering of the C4D component of the comp.=0A=0AI too wonder about = the functionality and interactivity of ray-traced=0Alayers with C4D layers.= =0A=0ARobert W. Walker=0ALos Angeles=0A=0A=0A> -------- Original Message --= ------=0A> Subject: Re: [AE] After Effects Technology Preview=0A> From: Sza= b=C3=B3_Gergely =0A> Date: Fri, April 05, 2013 1:59= pm=0A> To: "After Effects Mail List" =0A> =0A> = =0A> I am curious. CS6 using Raytraced renderer now. In CS7 If I import a = =0A> Cinema 4D project, for the render what It is gonna use? Gonna take =0A= > advantage of the GPU or not? As far as I have seen C4D also has some =0A>= kind of OpenGL support, but I don't know what does It mean exactly...=0A> = =0A> =0A> =0A> 4/5/13 7:14 PM keltez=C3=A9ssel, Byron Nash =C3=ADrta:=0A> >= I expect Adobe, Autodesk and others to move to a "cloud/subscription" =0A>= > model eventually and stop selling stand alone licensed versions. I =0A> = > don't mind it though. I always need/want to have the newest releases =0A>= > and feel comfortable paying for it like a utility bill instead of a =0A>= > large investment.=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Care= y Dissmore > > wrot= e:=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > On Apr 4, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Michael Malone > > wrote:=0A> >=0A> >> I've = always bought into the Production Premium bundle but=0A> >> something t= ells me that Cloud people will get first crack at this=0A> >> upgrade. = Maybe I'm just paranoid. Anyway, I don't want to miss=0A> >> out on thi= s discount if thats to be the case.=0A> >>=0A> >> thanks=0A> >=0A> >=0A= > > That "something telling you" is actually Adobe. No paranoia=0A> > = required :) Adobe has made it clear ever since the launch of the=0A> > = cloud that new features will be cloud first. The cloud model=0A> > c= hanges the paradigm of release windows considerably compared to=0A> > t= he bundled retail software release model.=0A> >=0A> > FWIW,=0A> > C= arey=0A> >=0A> >