Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f51.google.com ([209.85.128.51] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5034651 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:19:15 +0200 Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 1so1244551qec.38 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:27:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=jwQivG4rIcHuM9bDvhdBHEq+x7/SUUxmNwTuxi1bxIc=; b=jWRH8l9C3XKUknfpKeCoVsp85jYGeq055Hzl5bJg8VCs0pucsHxPBljfBPuZn/TdUo Fnk49wep8gnzA3UIUVmy2yIUk470tmKpdSO1/T7207CJsbZIzF5684/rJbXrCZZClY4r s0Awu+Od/OS0lKTA/SsMlVVkGC5srzKqkhQ7YSuu0LtUO8SV5QCWE7FnlEc1FDLq1Qoq mLGzlo4Vi5qGmIuQhIIXfaGjgcFVUgSwDzoqKj1n4TDtI3AW45yhaRmVBa6iFfE0zXGj i85zJFgEMNZDjP+wMGsTX3DVVnGxf3uXBnb8RTie9R8tFAVvybjwfy/pLWxBNGe1km7t yMAg== X-Received: by 10.49.61.226 with SMTP id t2mr11011952qer.40.1365726431571; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.78] (99-122-110-1.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [99.122.110.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ei3sm10736836qab.10.2013.04.11.17.27.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [AE] After Effects/Motion Graphics Conferences References: From: Christopher Biggs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8F3B30DC-6698-4ED6-81CF-6B9C7396486F X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <4DDCBD40-80AC-4936-9FAA-C519C911789C@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:27:04 -0700 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-8F3B30DC-6698-4ED6-81CF-6B9C7396486F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, I'll ask. When and where is the Motion Conference? ( is it the one in N Mex?) Thanks Chris Sent from Chris's iPhone On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Tony Romain wr= ote: > SIGGRAPH tends to skew more heavy tech/nuts and bolts of graphics creation= . Where as the Motion Conference skews much more toward creative process an= d inspiration. So it all really depends on what you are hoping to get out o= f your experience. If you're really into the nitty gritty of particle simul= ation and 3d motion tracking, etc, SIGGRAPH is probably more for you. There= is definitely a HOW-TO component to the Motion Conference, but your not lik= ely to drill into the finer points of ambient occlusion and subsurface light= scattering there=E2=80=A6 >=20 >=20 > -- > tony romain | principal/creative director >=20 > trance > motion graphic animation and design > 323 651 1114 > www.trancedesigns.com >=20 > From: Byron Nash > Reply-To: AE list > Date: Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:12 PM > To: AE list > Subject: Re: [AE] After Effects/Motion Graphics Conferences >=20 > Bumping this topic to generate some feedback. I'm looking into going to SI= GGRAPH again this year. I've been 5 times in the past 15 years. I always get= a lot out of it but just thought I would ask how it might be compared to th= e Motion Conference. I know that conference will be favored on this list but= I'm especially keen to hear from someone who has been to both shows. My tas= tes lean toward VFX and 3D with an interest in things like particles and sim= ulation over pure motion design.=20 >=20 > Anyone care to share experiences? >=20 --Apple-Mail-8F3B30DC-6698-4ED6-81CF-6B9C7396486F Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok, I'll ask.
When and where= is the Motion Conference?
( is it the one in N Mex?)
Thanks
Chris

Sent from Chris's iPhone

On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Tony Romain <tonyr-aelist@trancedesigns.com> wrote:
SIGGRAPH tends to skew= more heavy tech/nuts and bolts of graphics creation.  Where as the Mot= ion Conference skews much more toward creative process and inspiration. &nbs= p;So it all really depends on what you are hoping to get out of your experie= nce.  If you're really into the nitty gritty of particle simulation and= 3d motion tracking, etc, SIGGRAPH is probably more for you.  There is d= efinitely a HOW-TO component to the Motion Conference, but your not likely t= o drill into the finer points of ambient occlusion and subsurface light scat= tering there=E2=80=A6


--
tony= romain | principal/c= reative director

trance
motion graphic animation and design
323 651 1114

From: Byron Nash <by= ronnash@gmail.com>
Reply-To: AE list <AE-List@media-mot= ion.tv>
Date: Thursday, A= pril 11, 2013 1:12 PM
To: AE lis= t <AE-List@media-motion.tv= >
Subject: Re: [AE] After Eff= ects/Motion Graphics Conferences

Bumping this topic to gene= rate some feedback. I'm looking into going to SIGGRAPH again this year. I've= been 5 times in the past 15 years. I always get a lot out of it but just th= ought I would ask how it might be compared to the Motion Conference. I know t= hat conference will be favored on this list but I'm especially keen to hear f= rom someone who has been to both shows. My tastes lean toward VFX and 3D wit= h an interest in things like particles and simulation over pure motion desig= n. 

Anyone care to share experiences?
= --Apple-Mail-8F3B30DC-6698-4ED6-81CF-6B9C7396486F--