Return-Path: Received: from gateway03.websitewelcome.com ([67.18.34.23] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5034780 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 06:55:37 +0200 Received: by gateway03.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id AB24D8438C9A3; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:03:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gator1184.hostgator.com (gator1184.hostgator.com [174.121.151.98]) by gateway03.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E53D8438C97F for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:03:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [24.163.5.74] (port=58074 helo=Neptune) by gator1184.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UQW98-0001KB-9U for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:03:34 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Stephen van Vuuren" To: "'After Effects Mail List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [AE] Amd for ae+c4d Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 01:03:29 -0400 Organization: SV2 Studios Message-ID: <027001ce373b$1300f0f0$3902d2d0$@sv2studios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0271_01CE3719.8BF06260" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQDshFi6AfdPoCuOLoZP3T2IPQDJM5qVa9uA Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator1184.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sv2studios.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: (Neptune) [24.163.5.74]:58074 X-Source-Auth: stephen@sv2studios.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c3RlcGhlbnY7c3RlcGhlbnY7Z2F0b3IxMTg0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0271_01CE3719.8BF06260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I will strongly second TG. =20 3930k is absolutely by benchmarks and real world use the best price = performance CPU on the market for graphic/video apps. I=E2=80=99ve got = it gently OC=E2=80=99d with air to 4Ghz, 64GB of RAM for easy 6GB per = core in AE. Runs even apps like C4D faster than stock 8 and 12 core = Xeons that are not RAM starved. And AE is just flat out faster than any = AMD and most all of the Xeon line regardless of thread count. And still = cool and quiet.=20 =20 OC=E2=80=99d a 8-thread AMD is unlikely to be as easy nor nearly as = fast. 3930k is worth every penny =E2=80=93 highly recommended. =20 stephen van vuuren 336.202.4777 =20 http://www.insaturnsrings.com/ http://www.sv2dcp.com/ http://www.sv2studios.com/ =20 A film is =E2=80=93 or should be =E2=80=93 more like music than like = fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, = what=E2=80=99s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later. =E2=80=93Stanley Kubrick =20 From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf = Of rik bogusz Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 12:40 AM To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] Amd for ae+c4d =20 The 3930 wasnt really on my radar. I've been weighing the fx-8350 = against the i7-3770, which in multi-threaded apps, the amd cpu seems to = be an option worth considering. =20 This machine will be primarily to replace an aging clovertown Mac Pro at = home. Now you've really got me thinking about the 3930. if I can get = work to cover half... On Apr 11, 2013, at 20:03, Teddy Gage wrote: In terms of price to performance ratio the Intel core i7 3930k blows any = amd chip out of the water. Pure thread count is not necessarily the best = indicator of efficiency. Look at some benchmarks before you buy. You may = spend a little more but the performance boost could be worth it. = Especially when you factor in upgrade costs in buying slower tech. My = two cents. Tg On Apr 11, 2013 10:04 PM, "rik bogusz" wrote: I'm building a pc whose tasks will be primarily ae and c4d work and = rendering. After some research, I'm leaning to Amd's fx-8350 for the = CPU. Has anyone been giving these newish CPUs a good mograph workout = yet? 8 threads at <$200 is looking pretty good. Thoughts? Thanks guys! +---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to ------=_NextPart_000_0271_01CE3719.8BF06260 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I will strongly second TG.

 

3930k is absolutely by benchmarks and real world use the best price = performance CPU on the market for graphic/video apps. I=E2=80=99ve got = it gently OC=E2=80=99d with air to 4Ghz, 64GB of RAM for easy 6GB per = core in AE. Runs even apps like C4D faster than stock 8 and 12 core = Xeons that are not RAM starved. And AE is just flat out faster than any = AMD and most all of the Xeon line regardless of thread count. =C2=A0And = still cool and quiet.

 

OC=E2=80=99d a 8-thread AMD is unlikely to be as easy nor nearly as = fast. 3930k is worth every penny =E2=80=93 highly = recommended.

 

stephen van vuuren

336.202.4777

 

http://www.insaturnsrings.com/=

http://www.sv2dcp.com/<= /b>

http://www.sv2studios.com/<= /span>

 

A film is =E2=80=93 or should be =E2=80=93 more like music than like = fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, = what=E2=80=99s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes = later.

=E2=80=93Stanley Kubrick

 

From:= = After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of = rik bogusz
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 12:40 = AM
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] Amd = for ae+c4d

 

The = 3930 wasnt really on my radar. I've been weighing the fx-8350 against = the i7-3770, which in multi-threaded apps, the amd cpu seems to be an = option worth considering.  

This machine will be primarily to replace an aging = clovertown Mac Pro at home. Now you've really got me thinking about = the 3930.  if I can get work to cover = half...


On Apr 11, 2013, at 20:03, Teddy Gage = <teddygage@gmail.com> = wrote:

In terms of price = to performance ratio the Intel core i7 3930k blows any amd chip out of = the water. Pure thread count is not necessarily the best indicator of = efficiency. Look at some benchmarks before you buy. You may spend a = little more but the performance boost could be worth it. Especially when = you factor in upgrade costs in buying slower tech. My two = cents.
Tg

On Apr 11, 2013 = 10:04 PM, "rik bogusz" <rik.gaijin@mac.com> = wrote:

I'm building a pc whose tasks = will be primarily ae and c4d work and rendering. After some research, = I'm leaning to Amd's fx-8350 for the CPU. Has anyone been giving these = newish CPUs a good mograph workout yet? 8 threads at <$200 is looking = pretty good. Thoughts? Thanks guys!
+---End of message---+
To = unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

------=_NextPart_000_0271_01CE3719.8BF06260--