Return-Path: Received: from nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com ([17.158.232.236] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5034798 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:15:01 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (cpe-76-169-79-237.socal.res.rr.com [76.169.79.237]) by nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-26.01(7.0.4.26.0) 64bit (built Jul 13 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0ML400IQXMY0YS80@nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 05:22:54 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-04-12_02:2013-04-11,2013-04-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1302030000 definitions=main-1304110350 Subject: Re: [AE] Amd for ae+c4d References: From: rik bogusz Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-45A5E0ED-D94B-40DF-B65A-15C87236896A X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) In-reply-to: Message-id: <1EC28DCD-A873-4030-B5F0-567174EB4858@mac.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:22:48 -0700 To: After Effects Mail List Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-45A5E0ED-D94B-40DF-B65A-15C87236896A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the advice, the i7 3930 it is! If I have to space out the purchas= e of some of the components, so be it! On Apr 11, 2013, at 22:03, Stephen van Vuuren wrote= : > I will strongly second TG. > =20 > 3930k is absolutely by benchmarks and real world use the best price perfor= mance CPU on the market for graphic/video apps. I=E2=80=99ve got it gently O= C=E2=80=99d with air to 4Ghz, 64GB of RAM for easy 6GB per core in AE. Runs e= ven apps like C4D faster than stock 8 and 12 core Xeons that are not RAM sta= rved. And AE is just flat out faster than any AMD and most all of the Xeon l= ine regardless of thread count. And still cool and quiet. > =20 > OC=E2=80=99d a 8-thread AMD is unlikely to be as easy nor nearly as fast. 3= 930k is worth every penny =E2=80=93 highly recommended. > =20 > stephen van vuuren > 336.202.4777 > =20 > http://www.insaturnsrings.com/ > http://www.sv2dcp.com/ > http://www.sv2studios.com/ > =20 > A film is =E2=80=93 or should be =E2=80=93 more like music than like ficti= on. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what=E2=80=99= s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later. > =E2=80=93Stanley Kubrick > =20 > From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf O= f rik bogusz > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 12:40 AM > To: After Effects Mail List > Subject: Re: [AE] Amd for ae+c4d > =20 > The 3930 wasnt really on my radar. I've been weighing the fx-8350 against t= he i7-3770, which in multi-threaded apps, the amd cpu seems to be an option w= orth considering. =20 > This machine will be primarily to replace an aging clovertown Mac Pro at h= ome. Now you've really got me thinking about the 3930. if I can get work to= cover half... >=20 > On Apr 11, 2013, at 20:03, Teddy Gage wrote: >=20 > In terms of price to performance ratio the Intel core i7 3930k blows any a= md chip out of the water. Pure thread count is not necessarily the best indi= cator of efficiency. Look at some benchmarks before you buy. You may spend a= little more but the performance boost could be worth it. Especially when yo= u factor in upgrade costs in buying slower tech. My two cents. > Tg >=20 > On Apr 11, 2013 10:04 PM, "rik bogusz" wrote: > I'm building a pc whose tasks will be primarily ae and c4d work and render= ing. After some research, I'm leaning to Amd's fx-8350 for the CPU. Has anyo= ne been giving these newish CPUs a good mograph workout yet? 8 threads at <$= 200 is looking pretty good. Thoughts? Thanks guys! > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to --Apple-Mail-45A5E0ED-D94B-40DF-B65A-15C87236896A Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the advice, the i7 3930 it i= s! If I have to space out the purchase of some of the components, so be it!<= /div>

On Apr 11, 2013, at 22:03, Stephen van Vuuren <stephen@sv2studios.com> wrote:

<= /div>

I will strongly second TG.

 

3930k is absolutely= by benchmarks and real world use the best price performance CPU on the mark= et for graphic/video apps. I=E2=80=99ve got it gently OC=E2=80=99d with air t= o 4Ghz, 64GB of RAM for easy 6GB per core in AE. Runs even apps like C4D fas= ter than stock 8 and 12 core Xeons that are not RAM starved. And AE is just f= lat out faster than any AMD and most all of the Xeon line regardless of thre= ad count.  And still cool and quiet.

 

OC=E2=80=99d a 8-thread AMD is unlikel= y to be as easy nor nearly as fast. 3930k is worth every penny =E2=80=93 hig= hly recommended.

 

stephen van vuuren

336.202.4777

 

http://www.insaturnsrings.co= m/<= /p>

http://www.sv2dcp.com/

= http://= www.sv2studios.com/

 

A film is =E2=80=93 or should be =E2= =80=93 more like music than like fiction. It should be a progression of mood= s and feelings. The theme, what=E2=80=99s behind the emotion, the meaning, a= ll that comes later.

=E2=80=93Stanley Kubrick

 <= /p>

From: After Effects Mail List [mai= lto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of rik bogusz
Sent:<= /b> Friday, April 12, 2013 12:40 AM
To: After Effects Mail ListSubject: Re: [AE] Amd for ae+c4d

 

The 39= 30 wasnt really on my radar. I've been weighing the fx-8350 against the i7-3= 770, which in multi-threaded apps, the amd cpu seems to be an option worth c= onsidering.  

This mach= ine will be primarily to replace an aging clovertown Mac Pro at home. N= ow you've really got me thinking about the 3930.  if I can get work to c= over half...


On Apr 11, 2013, at 20:03, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:

In te= rms of price to performance ratio the Intel core i7 3930k blows any amd chip= out of the water. Pure thread count is not necessarily the best indicator o= f efficiency. Look at some benchmarks before you buy. You may spend a little= more but the performance boost could be worth it. Especially when you facto= r in upgrade costs in buying slower tech. My two cents.
Tg

=

On Apr 11, 2013 10:04 PM, "rik bogusz" <rik.gaijin@mac.com> wrote:

I'm building a pc whose tasks will be primarily a= e and c4d work and rendering. After some research, I'm leaning to Amd's fx-8= 350 for the CPU. Has anyone been giving these newish CPUs a good mograph wor= kout yet? 8 threads at <$200 is looking pretty good. Thoughts? Thanks guy= s!
+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>= ;

= --Apple-Mail-45A5E0ED-D94B-40DF-B65A-15C87236896A--