Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv ? Message #48560
From: Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Camcorder recommendations
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:13:53 -0400
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
What is your budget for this camera? What is your priority for the hi-speed mode? While there are a few new cameras with optional hi-speed mode, I'd suggest that unless you are looking for true 400-1000 fps hispeed, you remove that from the list because it really limits your options. The things you can do with AE and twixtor / reel smart motion blur will cover the gap, as long as the camera does decent 60p at 1080.

If you really need decent hi-speed footage at those framerates, you are probably better off renting a solution than owning a camera with limited uses. That being said, the casio Excilim hi-speed series is really the only camera system in the prosumer price range that does good slow-mo. And even then you need tons of light and accepting cropped HD frames for 600 fps+.

The prosumer defacto "standard" right now is the Canon 5D mark III which will run you $2,500 - 4000 depending on lenses and options. I personally own a Nikon d5100 for personal still photography, but the video is quite excellent with a good prime. The autofocus is pretty good and you're looking at under $1k

For handheld video I own a canon Vixia HF100, because it's lightweight, has excellent compression, good low light performance and amazing autofocus. You can find it used for under $500, which is really great. It is perfect for shooting concerts and has all the features you requested minus the hispeed. However it does use .mxf format which can be a pain to convert.


On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Emile Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T) <emile@foryourhead.com> wrote:
Hi,

I'm looking for a camera with as many as possible of the below features. Currently using a Lumix LX 7, which does surprisingly well for a $400 camera mainly designed for stills/

1.      Compact
2.      Tapeless
3.      1080 24p. 30 p. (60 i optional)
4.      Better (i.e. less)  compression than the 34:1 of my Lumix  LX - 7.
5.      Mac- compatible software.
6.      No 4 gig file limit.
7.      High speed shooting for slow mo.
8.      Good optics -- ideally comparable with Lumix
9.      Better zoom ratio than LX 7
10.     Ideally can shoot high quality 5 MP or better stills.
11.     Long shutter speed shooting for in camera blurs
12.     Good low light performance.

My Lumix LX 7 has all but 4, 5, 6, 7, 9

Thanks.
--
-- Emile

If you can walk, you can surely DANCE

My photography can be viewed at http://www.flickr.com/photos/22231918@N06/collections/72157603627170351/

My videos can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/Tobenfeld




+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster