Return-Path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5042274 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:33:22 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([unknown] [50.201.159.194]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MLF00BAIJGW4UA4@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:41:23 -0500 (CDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Message-id: In-reply-to: References: Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:25:37 -0400 To: "After Effects Mail List" From: "Emile Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T)" Subject: lX 7 was Re: [AE] Camcorder recommendations Cc: Jim Lang Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed At 9:21 PM -0400 4/17/13, Jim Lang wrote: >I know a professional nature photographer who swears by Lumix for >stills. Thanks for reminding me to get one. The best photographer I know was talking about the LX3 for a year before I got one. I've since updated to the LX 7 for most things -- still use the 3 for pictures like http://www.flickr.com/photos/22231918@N06/sets/72157633045688377/ which are best done with live feedback in burst mode. Fits in your pocket -- optics as good as my D 90 lenses and take usable (by me, at least) video. > >On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe ><jack@javapost.ca> wrote: > >Yes, except AVCHD on the Sony at a maximum 28 mbits vs h264 at 72 >mbits on the GH3 if video record quality is really important to you. > > >Jack Tunnicliffe > >Java Post Production > > > >On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Evan Fotis ><evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote: > >>~$500-$700 nex 5R or nex6 >> >>APS-C sensor >>60p >>many lens adapters >>focus peaking > >On 17-Apr-13 20:43, Emile Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T) wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I'm looking for a camera with as many as possible of the below >>features. Currently using a Lumix LX 7, which does surprisingly >>well for a $400 camera mainly designed for stills/ >> >>1. Compact >>2. Tapeless >>3. 1080 24p. 30 p. (60 i optional) >>4. Better (i.e. less) compression than the 34:1 of my Lumix LX - 7. >>5. Mac- compatible software. >>6. No 4 gig file limit. >>7. High speed shooting for slow mo. >>8. Good optics -- ideally comparable with Lumix >>9. Better zoom ratio than LX 7 >>10. Ideally can shoot high quality 5 MP or better stills. >>11. Long shutter speed shooting for in camera blurs >>12. Good low light performance. >> >>My Lumix LX 7 has all but 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 >> >>Thanks. -- -- Emile If you can walk, you can surely DANCE My photography can be viewed at http://www.flickr.com/photos/22231918@N06/collections/72157603627170351/ My videos can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/Tobenfeld