|
|
At 9:21 PM -0400 4/17/13, Jim Lang wrote:
I know a professional nature photographer who swears by Lumix for stills. Thanks for reminding me to get one.
The best photographer I know was talking about the LX3 for a year before I got one. I've since updated to the LX 7 for most things -- still use the 3 for pictures like http://www.flickr.com/photos/22231918@N06/sets/72157633045688377/ which are best done with live feedback in burst mode.
Fits in your pocket -- optics as good as my D 90 lenses and take usable (by me, at least) video.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe <<mailto:jack@javapost.ca>jack@javapost.ca> wrote:
Yes, except AVCHD on the Sony at a maximum 28 mbits vs h264 at 72 mbits on the GH3 if video record quality is really important to you.
Jack Tunnicliffe
Java Post Production
On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Evan Fotis <<mailto:evan.fotis@gmail.com>evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:
~$500-$700 nex 5R or nex6
APS-C sensor
60p
many lens adapters
focus peaking
On 17-Apr-13 20:43, Emile Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T) wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a camera with as many as possible of the below features. Currently using a Lumix LX 7, which does surprisingly well for a $400 camera mainly designed for stills/
1. Compact
2. Tapeless
3. 1080 24p. 30 p. (60 i optional)
4. Better (i.e. less) compression than the 34:1 of my Lumix LX - 7.
5. Mac- compatible software.
6. No 4 gig file limit.
7. High speed shooting for slow mo.
8. Good optics -- ideally comparable with Lumix
9. Better zoom ratio than LX 7
10. Ideally can shoot high quality 5 MP or better stills.
11. Long shutter speed shooting for in camera blurs
12. Good low light performance.
My Lumix LX 7 has all but 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
Thanks.
--
-- Emile
If you can walk, you can surely DANCE
My photography can be viewed at http://www.flickr.com/photos/22231918@N06/collections/72157603627170351/
My videos can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/Tobenfeld
|
|
