The GH3 is truly great for videographers, only limited by its small
sensor which compromises low light performance. It costs a tad more
than the Nex too and also bizarrely lack focus assist/peaking.
Here's a thorough review:
http://www.eoshd.com/content/9920/gh3-review
Forgot to mention that the NEX family also can get the metabones
speedbooster that does wonders, giving FF angle and gaining 1 stop
in aperture!
On 18-Apr-13 00:43, Jack Tunnicliffe
wrote:
Yes, except AVCHD on the Sony at a maximum 28 mbits vs h264 at 72
mbits on the GH3 if video record quality is really important to
you.
Jack Tunnicliffe
Java Post Production
~$500-$700 nex 5R or
nex6
- APS-C sensor
- 60p
- many lens adapters
- focus peaking
On 17-Apr-13 20:43, Emile
Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T) wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a camera with as many as possible of the
below features. Currently using a Lumix LX 7, which does
surprisingly well for a $400 camera mainly designed for
stills/
1.   Compact
2.   Tapeless
3.   1080 24p. 30 p. (60 i optional)
4.   Better (i.e. less) compression than the 34:1 of my
Lumix LX - 7.
5.   Mac- compatible software.
6.   No 4 gig file limit.
7.   High speed shooting for slow mo.
8.   Good optics -- ideally comparable with Lumix
9.   Better zoom ratio than LX 7
10.   Ideally can shoot high quality 5 MP or better
stills.
11.   Long shutter speed shooting for in camera blurs
12.   Good low light performance.
My Lumix LX 7 has all but 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
Thanks.
|
