Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.219.42] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5042658 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:29:11 +0200 Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i18so2718291oag.29 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:37:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yet4ZR9/McuyuXMPbguAY9PagMvUI8F2DYNmZRJlM9s=; b=KbI8WlWHdJ+Y1EgZBnPg6rkAYfteBEa0TUr78y6kQ/DGZWWUQVkDx2c+ztCSm1D/AD v60r2+Y+74MKrucT6rhJzp157jpK90ee+DReu3htmhCDQilMkD8nlH3Cv4nx/BOUJ48w FFSQ0vO1cko/JCEpZHcz9h7htK6m2Nd7xZnelAMaa2f+p3mdHfeF9MN1Wcmx6lyKA8BD U/3YvKcbOlIURpxRHbT4WVgCg6FMy3lPz4UuBYGNkm0kaAHhCwE2n5f/JUVpMStd7XtP 2A7NV47yyjSAFhdWhyX5jJ5CsPAgVEvinoS/v/d4Qqi1UBP7gzBcCnqVm6tFVH5YwQLe SfOw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.92.230 with SMTP id cp6mr4774434oeb.91.1366288639279; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.153.198 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:37:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:37:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Camcorder recommendations From: Jim Lang To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33cf0e014a4904daa1dd8f --047d7b33cf0e014a4904daa1dd8f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 'small sensor which compromises low light performance' That kills it for me. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Evan Fotis wrote: > The GH3 is truly great for videographers, only limited by its small > sensor which compromises low light performance. It costs a tad more than > the Nex too and also bizarrely lack focus assist/peaking. > Here's a thorough review: > http://www.eoshd.com/content/9920/gh3-review > > Forgot to mention that the NEX family also can get the metabones > speedbooster that does wonders, giving FF angle and gaining 1 stop in > aperture! > > > On 18-Apr-13 00:43, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: > > Yes, except AVCHD on the Sony at a maximum 28 mbits vs h264 at 72 mbits on > the GH3 if video record quality is really important to you. > > Jack Tunnicliffe > > Java Post Production > > > > On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Evan Fotis wrote: > > ~$500-$700 nex 5R or nex6 > > > - APS-C sensor > - 60p > - many lens adapters > - focus peaking > > > On 17-Apr-13 20:43, Emile Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T) wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for a camera with as many as possible of the below features. > Currently using a Lumix LX 7, which does surprisingly well for a $400 > camera mainly designed for stills/ > > 1. Compact > 2. Tapeless > 3. 1080 24p. 30 p. (60 i optional) > 4. Better (i.e. less) compression than the 34:1 of my Lumix LX - 7. > 5. Mac- compatible software. > 6. No 4 gig file limit. > 7. High speed shooting for slow mo. > 8. Good optics -- ideally comparable with Lumix > 9. Better zoom ratio than LX 7 > 10. Ideally can shoot high quality 5 MP or better stills. > 11. Long shutter speed shooting for in camera blurs > 12. Good low light performance. > > My Lumix LX 7 has all but 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 > > Thanks. > > > > > --047d7b33cf0e014a4904daa1dd8f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
'small sensor which compromises l= ow light performance'

That kills it for me. =A0


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Evan Fotis = <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
The GH3 is truly great for videographers, only limited by its small sensor which compromises low light performance.=A0 It costs a tad more than the Nex too and also bizarrely lack focus assist/peaking.
Here's a thorough review:
http://www.eoshd.com/content/9920/gh3-review

Forgot to mention that the NEX family also can get the metabones speedbooster that does wonders, giving FF angle and gaining 1 stop in aperture!


On 18-Apr-13 00:43, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote:
=20 Yes, except AVCHD on the Sony at a maximum 28 mbits vs h264 at 72 mbits on the GH3 if video record quality is really important to you.
=
Jack Tunnicliffe

Java Post Prod= uction

On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:

=20
~$50= 0-$700 nex 5R or nex6
  • APS-C sensor
  • 60p
  • many lens adapters
  • focus peaking

On 17-Apr-13 20:43, Emile Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T) wrote:
Hi,

I'm looking for a camera with as many as possible of the below features. Currently using a Lumix LX 7, which does surprisingly well for a $400 camera mainly designed for stills/

1.=A0=A0=A0 Compact
2.=A0=A0=A0 Tapeless
3.=A0=A0=A0 1080 24p. 30 p. (60 i optional)
4.=A0=A0=A0 Better (i.e. less)=A0 compression than the 34:1 o= f my Lumix=A0 LX - 7.
5.=A0=A0=A0 Mac- compatible software.
6.=A0=A0=A0 No 4 gig file limit.
7.=A0=A0=A0 High speed shooting for slow mo.
8.=A0=A0=A0 Good optics -- ideally comparable with Lumix
9.=A0=A0=A0 Better zoom ratio than LX 7
10.=A0=A0=A0 Ideally can shoot high quality 5 MP or better stills.
11.=A0=A0=A0 Long shutter speed shooting for in camera blurs =
12.=A0=A0=A0 Good low light performance.

My Lumix LX 7 has all but 4, 5, 6, 7, 9

Thanks.




--047d7b33cf0e014a4904daa1dd8f--