Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5044133 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:17:12 +0200 Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id gf12so4289044vcb.18 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:25:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xuVVns/9GeVllcFE4qMlgIJlo9Z7w7ymzAWKke2XT2w=; b=bG2HG0wI/JWieCVkHmar3lmdt5TqVDaorDRoGrCswvjVlE/5/vkguxfIdNbhQm7snG qV8EYic/C/mP140XJEiLpZgHx4rE0agPo+xpC1cuvygoIq4Gw1CODE7Oe50T0XNtr+4b yjax6iPnxR9n2/pYm9J0BgxsHIz+abhDbrEMS/MKj4ZmYDZIjAa1MAOpy/AZnULQUBdI 0p7N8eX4q4kVhk3B8r0sy62C2+WMiSHcd+xOv1eZrHdpZa3zRp0lKxiWcsBEHCqGGwKv KQh1yiBpZlHeA89KkH57hD6aV7gXD4M9/enz0CJoMGqNl47ux7CdhJZ9mawUnoUgnZ/c mhEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.188.70 with SMTP id cz6mr12745826vcb.20.1366403123952; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: marcelvanberk@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.187.74 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:25:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:25:23 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 76CbPQqshDooMvLhxig20GpKI3A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] uggh - format question - PAL FHA From: LSSLSS To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01295126d2f1ea04dabc8431 --089e01295126d2f1ea04dabc8431 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 pal d1/dv widescreen should be correct. cheers, marcel Op vrijdag 19 april 2013 schreef J Bills (jbillsnews@flickfx.com) het volgende: > ah - when they say "anamorphic" is it common to be just "widescreen" > (16:9) or is it true anamorphic (2:1)? I assumed the more literal 2:1 > anamorphic but if they're just referring loosely to that as the process of > unsqueezing then I should redo this at 16:9 > > the more I think about it, it does seem silly to slap it into a 2:1 PAR > when it's HD content, so yeah squeezing down the 16:9 and not 2:1 is > sounding right. > > sound correct? > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Robert Kjettrup > > wrote: > >> >>> On an international spot and it's been a while since I've done this, but >>> they want the HD master to be delivered as Full Height animorphic PAL. >>> must be some sort of broadcast standard in one of the delivering >>> countries. >>> >>> Soooo, the AE template for that is 1050x576 >>> >>> But I'm assuming I take this and drop it into a regular pal comp and >>> then squeeze the sides to fit the frame, keeping the "full height" and >>> deliver it squeezed into this regular PAL format. >>> >>> Is that correct or am I missing something? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >> Use the "PAL D1/DV Widescreen" comp preset and drop you HD format into >> this and use "Fit to Comp Height" to make it fit, or just use "Fit to Comp" >> if you don't care for a bit stretched footage, i do this regularly just to >> avoid the small black pillarboxes in the sides >> >> - Robert >> >> > -- met vriendelijke groet/ kind regards, marcel van berk hoge bomen / LSSLSS Rotterdam NL info@lsslss.nl 06 485 605 58 --089e01295126d2f1ea04dabc8431 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable pal d1/dv widescreen should be correct.

cheers,
marcel

Op vrijdag 19 april 2013 schreef J Bills (jbillsnews@flickfx.com) het volge= nde:
ah - when they say "an= amorphic" is it common to be just "widescreen" (16:9) or is = it true anamorphic (2:1)? =A0I assumed the more literal 2:1 anamorphic but = if they're just referring loosely to that as the process of unsqueezing= then I should redo this at 16:9

the more I think about it, it does seem silly to slap it int= o a 2:1 PAR when it's HD content, so yeah squeezing down the 16:9 and n= ot 2:1 is sounding right.

sound correct?



On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Robert Kjettrup <robert@stvmayday.dk> wrote:

On an international spot and it's been a while sin= ce I've done this, but they want the HD master to be delivered as Full = Height animorphic PAL. =A0must be some sort of broadcast standard in one of= the delivering countries.=A0

Soooo, the AE template for that is 1050x576

But I'm assuming I take this and drop it into a regular pal co= mp and then squeeze the sides to fit the frame, keeping the "full heig= ht" and deliver it squeezed into this regular PAL format.

Is that correct or am I missing something?
Thanks

Use the "= ;PAL D1/DV Widescreen" comp preset and drop you HD format into this an= d use "Fit to Comp Height" to make it fit, or just use "Fit = to Comp" if you don't care for a bit stretched footage, i do this = regularly just to avoid the small black pillarboxes in the sides
=A0
- Robert




--
met vriendelijke groet/ kind regards= ,

marcel van berk
hoge bomen / LSSLSS
Rotterdam NL

06 485 605 58


--089e01295126d2f1ea04dabc8431--