Return-Path: <teddygage@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 5045356 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:32:49 +0200
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id bs12so224888qab.16
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=R9U9sc/SaX6LseI8OQLhWu8aXrQXk9r8gTvfgotdxS8=;
        b=V9ZJDXNvSEy3Hj7SyhiOisrZhgil1DQyc213mt4JFl+78TgIfHPm83zyFi8g14mFID
         LBSqpqokdnlyY8525Rm9vtg/tjJTDNhtUcem40BakB5ZwcrBXYm3j2T1+iPYOhpE1wKp
         pcepy5+3Cqd37Oi1pbOyKHqaznDJKe1LzF3l0JjFH4W5oUqrmAtzMPKhX3T3Y1nxYIr1
         m6Xc44JJBBKzkf8pRGQU3iPtH9NZ/PzKg+5E7UAEq4TNo0iCyg4RxV6k84u1lNaL5I1b
         JEe8jOV6AO7SA+xdpfytIcNQ/59L5dpm5Oyrm+MhqANI26lw9UmxlOYfMuwmSAg+lPw9
         cYSA==
X-Received: by 10.224.44.2 with SMTP id y2mr19865975qae.7.1366576864027; Sun,
 21 Apr 2013 13:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.127.107 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:40:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPdXPWdWnWaPtQ4ke0sUWTQhYvzLPWSc8mDezmxBRD=LM--z4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc888289e80904dae4f8ef

--047d7bdc888289e80904dae4f8ef
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that
has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable
spreadsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance
of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I
wanted to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in
fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The
results were very interesting. The original thread is here

http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979

And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at

http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 /
6000) or any tesla card.

Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about
their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D
(using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)

The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last year
and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase.
viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a
poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance
in the 6xx consumer cards.

Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain from
saying what I think until people get a chance to check it out.
-TG


-- 
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn

--047d7bdc888289e80904dae4f8ef
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark =
at creative cow that has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a q=
uick, readable spreadsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compu=
te performance of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler =
6xx series. I wanted to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, becaus=
e it is in fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over=
 $3k. The results were very interesting. The original thread is here <br>

<br><a href=3D"http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979">http=
://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979</a><br><br></div>And I h=
ave posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at <br><br>

<a rel=3D"nofollow" href=3D"http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/">http://ww=
w.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/</a><br clear=3D"all"><div><div><br></div><div>W=
hat I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / 6000=
) or any tesla card.<br>

<br></div><div>Furthermore I&#39;d be interested to hear any thoughts from =
3D users about their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card =
for viewport 3D (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)<br><br></div>

<div>The amount of C4D work I&#39;ve been doing has only increased in the l=
ast year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that&#39;s only going to incr=
ease. viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is us=
ing a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute perform=
ance in the 6xx consumer cards.<br>

<br></div><div>Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I&#39=
;ll refrain from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it =
out.<br></div><div>-TG<br></div><div><br><br>-- <br><span style>Animator &a=
mp; Editor</span><br style>


<span style><a href=3D"http://www.teddygage.com" target=3D"_blank">www.tedd=
ygage.com</a></span><br style><span style>Brooklyn</span><br>
</div></div></div>

--047d7bdc888289e80904dae4f8ef--