Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5045976 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:18:33 +0200 Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hz11so6133327vcb.38 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HEU6m6eP5uXvbPZQqIiHtFpZ3hmao3/PGhwjU1wkMdQ=; b=Ryia1Wmht0t0CyebaJUtHNDeW31Yocxzn1Wd6ZxnC8AvHEOr7eeDJ/qv4Qt2mU7/ap np/vZgagkoNpv+LiEbOPL9pvBh7RyrovBuIl9cuGASDC0QNpnreJt2/3gJd16Hzf5dHr KQjInFZENOPNPFYuhZQvuyU3pn4BQ5sdpsTpgikfpenM+HnwRrySQLORFpzLZ8l2TJg3 2NjC9RawLAz6xTARHJAolXX+s25n/HMUe3Rwo+VtpAyx/B8yHQI45Grydnp62ZqoXjPu 4uvGesMAQeG6KdzYdKQhhIWWIVsBLty3l8CL8EVOSj/hGAgjVGXuSmM3PQJKMDie/mGT X3xg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.100.5 with SMTP id eu5mr16258166vdb.66.1366640809626; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.92.169 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:26:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:26:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks From: Darby Edelen To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071cf9afe535c04daf3dbc5 --20cf3071cf9afe535c04daf3dbc5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'd be curious to find out how Titan performs in these tests with double precision enabled vs. disabled from the nvidia control panel. I expect that the ray-traced renderer in AE is probably not double precision but I'd like to find out :) On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that > has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable > spreadsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance > of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I > wanted to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in > fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The > results were very interesting. The original thread is here > > http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979 > > And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at > > http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ > > What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / > 6000) or any tesla card. > > Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about > their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D > (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially) > > The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last year > and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. > viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a > poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance > in the 6xx consumer cards. > > Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain from > saying what I think until people get a chance to check it out. > -TG > > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > --20cf3071cf9afe535c04daf3dbc5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'd be curious to find out how Titan performs in these= tests with double precision enabled vs. disabled from the nvidia control p= anel.=A0 I expect that the ray-traced renderer in AE is probably not double= precision but I'd like to find out :)


On Sun,= Apr 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>= wrote:
So a while ago I poste= d an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that has gotten a lot of res= ponses, so I threw together a quick, readable spreadsheet of the results. I= was mainly curious about compute performance of the new titan card vs. las= t gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted to see if the titan was= worth the extra $1,000, because it is in fact a consumer version of the nv= idia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The results were very interesting. The= original thread is here

http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979
And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my se= rver at

http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

What I would love to add are any results with the newer qu= adros (5000 / 6000) or any tesla card.

Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from = 3D users about their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card = for viewport 3D (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)

The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the l= ast year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to incr= ease. viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is us= ing a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute perform= ance in the 6xx consumer cards.

Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'= ;ll refrain from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it = out.
-TG

<= br>--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.= com
Brooklyn

--20cf3071cf9afe535c04daf3dbc5--