DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=wywyP3GP7mPWKDrqoWv2SB+BCQ6bWLe7j/JgazMYHCmLxymc4k4YTvhHUhTi2xPyU0FYLNXvBjj3D10+6FgEzmV5XLjtVtIFTHoOT/Tf11g34/zI6srCAmPLmIX2JxVzX2QltOHCMO9ZSZsf3V6bY7nYjJrjizi70ep0T/CQkx8=;
Message-ID: <1366660991.89560.YahooMailClassic@web121906.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Young <aefilter@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
In-Reply-To: <list-5045949@media-motion.tv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="603548461-1570295330-1366660991=:89560"

--603548461-1570295330-1366660991=:89560
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can we get the project to test ourselves?

Rich


--- On Mon, 4/22/13, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:

From: rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing=
 benchmarks
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Date: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:04 AM

i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680.results are herehttp:/=
/www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/

=0A

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Szabo Gergo <formic.gergo@gmail.com> wrote=
:
=0AI would be curious about the results of the new iMacs mx680 card... Can =
amybod post a reszlt with that card?
ThanksGary

Az iPhone k=C3=A9sz=C3=BCl=C3=A9kemr=C5=91l k=C3=BCldve=0A
2013.04.21. d=C3=A1tummal, 22:40 id=C5=91pontban Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmai=
l.com> =C3=ADrta:

=0ASo a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow tha=
t has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable spre=
adsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance of t=
he new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I wante=
d to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in fact a c=
onsumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The results w=
ere very interesting. The original thread is here=20
=0A=0A=0A
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979

And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at=20
=0A
=0A=0Ahttp://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / 600=
0) or any tesla card.
=0A=0A=0A
Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about thei=
r experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D (us=
ing zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)

=0A=0A=0AThe amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the l=
ast year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase=
. viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using =
a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance=
 in the 6xx consumer cards.
=0A=0A=0A
Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain from sa=
ying what I think until people get a chance to check it out.
-TG


--=20
Animator & Editor
=0A=0A=0A=0Awww.teddygage.com
Brooklyn
=0A=0A


--=20
danny princz

exposedideas.com=0A=0A
--603548461-1570295330-1366660991=:89560
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">Can we get the project to test ourselves?<br>=
<br>Rich<br><span style=3D"font-size:large;"></span><br><br>--- On <b>Mon, =
4/22/13, rendernyc <i>&lt;rendernyc@gmail.com&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; pa=
dding-left: 5px;"><br>From: rendernyc &lt;rendernyc@gmail.com&gt;<br>Subjec=
t: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing bench=
marks<br>To: "After Effects Mail List" &lt;AE-List@media-motion.tv&gt;<br>D=
ate: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:04 AM<br><br><div id=3D"yiv1522462094"><div =
dir=3D"ltr">i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680.<div>resul=
ts are here</div><div><a rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://=
www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/">http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/</a></di=
v><div><br></div><div><br><div class=3D"yiv1522462094gmail_extra">=0A<br><b=
r><div class=3D"yiv1522462094gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, =
Szabo Gergo <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:for=
mic.gergo@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3Dformic.gerg=
o@gmail.com">formic.gergo@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"yiv1522462094gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l=
eft-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;pa=
dding-left:1ex;">=0A<div><div>I would be curious about the results of the n=
ew iMacs mx680 card... Can amybod post a reszlt with that card?</div><div><=
br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Gary<br><br>Az iPhone k=C3=A9sz=C3=BCl=C3=A9=
kemr=C5=91l k=C3=BCldve</div>=0A<div><br>2013.04.21. d=C3=A1tummal, 22:40 i=
d=C5=91pontban Teddy Gage &lt;<a rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:teddyga=
ge@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3Dteddygage@gmail.co=
m">teddygage@gmail.com</a>&gt; =C3=ADrta:<br><br></div><div><div class=3D"y=
iv1522462094h5"><div></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>=0A<div dir=3D"lt=
r"><div>So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative co=
w that has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable=
 spreadsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance=
 of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I =
wanted to see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in fac=
t a consumer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The resu=
lts were very interesting. The original thread is here <br>=0A=0A=0A<br><a =
rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://forums.creativecow.net/th=
read/2/1019120#1035979">http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035=
979</a><br><br></div>And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file=
) on my server at <br>=0A<br>=0A=0A<a rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank" hr=
ef=3D"http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/">http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENC=
HCS6/</a><br clear=3D"all"><div><div><br></div><div>What I would love to ad=
d are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / 6000) or any tesla card.<b=
r>=0A=0A=0A<br></div><div>Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thought=
s from 3D users about their experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consume=
r card for viewport 3D (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)<br><br></d=
iv>=0A=0A=0A<div>The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased =
in the last year and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to =
increase. viewport accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia i=
s using a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute per=
formance in the 6xx consumer cards.<br>=0A=0A=0A<br></div><div>Would also l=
ove to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain from saying what I =
think until people get a chance to check it out.<br></div><div>-TG<br></div=
><div><br><br>-- <br><span>Animator &amp; Editor</span><br>=0A=0A=0A=0A<spa=
n><a rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://www.teddygage.com">w=
ww.teddygage.com</a></span><br><span>Brooklyn</span><br>=0A</div></div></di=
v>=0A</div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=
=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>danny princz<br><br><a rel=3D"nofollow" targ=
et=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://exposedideas.com">exposedideas.com</a>=0A</div=
></div></div>=0A</div></blockquote></td></tr></table>
--603548461-1570295330-1366660991=:89560--