Return-Path: Received: from nm35-vm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([72.30.238.79] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5046305 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:17:29 +0200 Received: from [98.139.214.32] by nm35.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Apr 2013 20:25:45 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.254] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Apr 2013 20:25:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1067.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Apr 2013 20:25:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 671478.89930.bm@omp1067.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 7727 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Apr 2013 20:25:44 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1366662344; bh=wmg8S3iHTjNjISVUHL1sbH/ec8RAPGJECJBXoptRUQ8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Nta2r28yrveBo19CEXN6gDY7o/GSJTEUWXlQz2lmC+I9FGqqxebNAR7GF64VSzFLKwVj4knJGzzOHYRke6aTtE2XbNO2E0zhMpZTIPSXYfDagApvzEza0n9q0B3gUt5J2V4xyMlCYUxHh67DLiKg0eGcUU31kn8k36gzK/ZYVZA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tc+vfK8h5zXpnp6zXPnA6+n9+luSaNgBb3lZe+Qr+OnRIgwicLllVa2LBHDd1MV68FQws17TT1xIfkLPtUYoPfekT/Jz8WGR3XOmF2pZ4aAD6fpYE+/KdHgQqT0mdPiA+ZS2OMZO6v9K9Yo/35jUzCcRbhzINWj7wfYH39yDEp8=; X-YMail-OSG: ERMGmAsVM1kC_Rcdv_wiNbDbiVnp2RlyjOCrqcHw3W.HboN FlZzFbdTSHcl5wNtOGHxUUvaeZgJrlS63sqiHMo3cfvOUihaA0uy1wJnHXmo Q2pgQGpC5qjU._nTZ.s00lrOiQtpcMUQPqig0IlkgbO4.c9G.jD8A2vRlm5U VUfsPJSUD.PJgxKDDgF1ICADZx2tpsuakMvtmq7UxmLm.MeZ1wLW5cfWyo.U iI3ksfE.Wt3.eO7nlRNFbQavwyI5KOY9zRZsJvwosTWgEw1RC.TKuetQZ6xY udgW1oiEQa0aGjmCIRvpLX0k_juZtqK7qpNgBdVH9PlUdaRwxnYd6LVtQ2.0 BJf95GH_4CfSbBg16ZTHUEhPmygatsaWkuLglIu8nSlqWkFwZuCpsaZQZzN0 Xfj9cjmxc5IeehE.7AnCeTVrkxAHdu0QLUiymyVFsz2zGHBLHeMKXx8cJ2P7 K6TzF0dtUAbEzEig1GzsjopjKgiCMi3k2oglXOVtwsXmRpYGLzwHDyarA3A. rH0VjfW8_DiLapXgiCEDjWagLRNxFLutFgZwIm4IKdChSVza2OzrNJyUjqGR .NouZss04QwrWbosKaCruBQBK_TSk1kYr4tF2V6pvrNrza8yA_oFLpo4I99D jxQCVoyqiLz8sy29tJe5PCLbNbqc5PkIGQ2A4i7NGwHmYkCfGROTLozlF.uD qYYSc6XZDCw1VmKFQgueA.wBGMGzUjGhcsEGQBYMdHk5umhOvEPk2ffP9FEZ Fl8pZAH2oA0VrwwLj.ux15IYe2ROlMV536J2l.sbBE0QtTMPv0r0B.8PFm_2 YHzjd_5KXLOeWl2bSKqot5jORRMlLnwjSlM8K2l47TqmRcEbPFg-- Received: from [152.179.8.238] by web162704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:25:44 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,VGhhbmtzIFRlZGR5LgoKCkkganVzdCB0cmllZCBpdC4gNjoyMiBvbiBhIDEyY29yZSBaNjIwIDIuM2doeiAzMkdCIHdpdGggYSBHVFggNjgwIDJHQi4gUmlnaHQgaW4gbGluZSB3aXRoIHlvdXIgcmVzdWx0cy4KwqAKUmljayBFbWVyeQp3d3cucmlja2VtZXJ5LmNvbQoKCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCiBGcm9tOiBUZWRkeSBHYWdlIDx0ZWRkeWdhZ2VAZ21haWwuY29tPgpUbzogQWZ0ZXIgRWZmZWN0cyBNYWlsIExpc3QgPEFFLUxpc3RAbWVkaWEtbW90aW9uLnR2PiAKU2VudDogTW8BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.141.536 References: Message-ID: <1366662344.90112.YahooMailNeo@web162704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:25:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Rick Reply-To: Rick Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="958549312-1441811313-1366662344=:90112" --958549312-1441811313-1366662344=:90112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Teddy.=0A=0A=0AI just tried it. 6:22 on a 12core Z620 2.3ghz 32GB wi= th a GTX 680 2GB. Right in line with your results.=0A=C2=A0=0ARick Emery=0A= www.rickemery.com=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Teddy G= age =0ATo: After Effects Mail List =0ASent: Monday, April 22, 2013 4:18 PM=0ASubject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet= another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks=0A =0A=0A=0Amy= project is available here =0Ahttp://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/=0A=0Abut= obviously the results are different than Dan's bench=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Mon,= Apr 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich Young wrote:=0A=0ACan w= e get the project to test ourselves?=0A>=0A>Rich=0A>=0A>=0A>--- On Mon, 4/2= 2/13, rendernyc wrote:=0A>=0A>=0A>>From: rendernyc =0A>>Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards t= hread - Titan raytracing benchmarks=0A>>To: "After Effects Mail List" =0A>>Date: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:04 AM=0A>>=0A>>=0A= >>i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680.=0A>>results are her= e=0A>>http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A= >>=0A>>On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Szabo Gergo wrote:=0A>>=0A>>I would be curious about the results of the new iMacs mx6= 80 card... Can amybod post a reszlt with that card?=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>Thanks= =0A>>>Gary=0A>>>=0A>>>Az iPhone k=C3=A9sz=C3=BCl=C3=A9kemr=C5=91l k=C3=BCld= ve=0A>>>=0A>>>2013.04.21. d=C3=A1tummal, 22:40 id=C5=91pontban Teddy Gage <= teddygage@gmail.com> =C3=ADrta:=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>So a while ago I posted an= AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that has gotten a lot of respons= es, so I threw together a quick, readable spreadsheet of the results. I was= mainly curious about compute performance of the new titan card vs. last ge= n 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted to see if the titan was wor= th the extra $1,000, because it is in fact a consumer version of the nvidia= k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The results were very interesting. The ori= ginal thread is here =0A>>>>=0A>>>>http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1= 019120#1035979=0A>>>>=0A>>>>And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchma= rk file) on my server at =0A>>>>=0A>>>>http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/= =0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>What I would love to add are any results with t= he newer quadros (5000 / 6000) or any tesla card.=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>Furth= ermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about their exp= eriences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D (using z= brush / maya / or C4D especially)=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>The amount of C4D wor= k I've been doing has only increased in the last year and I can imagine whe= n CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. viewport accuracy is going t= o be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a poor strategy to differentia= te the quadros by gimping compute performance in the 6xx consumer cards.=0A= >>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'= ll refrain from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it o= ut.=0A>>>>=0A>>>>-TG=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>=0A>>>>-- =0A>>>>Animator & Editor= =0A>>>>www.teddygage.com=0A>>>>Brooklyn=0A>>>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>-- =0A>>danny = princz=0A>>=0A>>exposedideas.com =0A=0A=0A-- =0AAnimator & Editor=0Awww.te= ddygage.com=0ABrooklyn --958549312-1441811313-1366662344=:90112 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Teddy.<= /div>

I just tried it. 6:22 on a = 12core Z620 2.3ghz 32GB with a GTX 680 2GB. Right in line with your results= .
 
Rick Emery
www.rickemery.= com
From: T= eddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>=
Sent: Monday, April = 22, 2013 4:18 PM
Subject:<= /b> Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benc= hmarks

=0A
my project is available here
=0Ahttp://= www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

but obviously the results are differen= t than Dan's bench
=0A=0A<= br>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:03= PM, Rich Young <a= efilter@yahoo.com> wrote:
=0A=0A=
Can we get the project to test ourselves?

Rich

--- On Mon, 4/22/13, r= endernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
=0A=0A

From: rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com>
Subject:= Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchma= rks
=0A=0ATo: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Date: Monday, April 2= 2, 2013, 7:04 AM

i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680.
=0A=0Aresults a= re here
http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/

=

=0A

On Mon, = Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Szabo Gergo <formic.gergo@gmail.com> wrote:
=0A=0A
=0A
I would be curious about the results of the new = iMacs mx680 card... Can amybod post a reszlt with that card?

=
Thanks
Gary

Az iPhone k=C3=A9sz=C3=BCl=C3=A9kem= r=C5=91l k=C3=BCldve
=0A=0A=0A

2013.04.21. d=C3=A1tummal, 22:4= 0 id=C5=91pontban Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>= =C3=ADrta:

=0A= =0A
=0A
So a = while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that has go= tten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable spreadsheet = of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance of the new t= itan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted to see= if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in fact a consumer = version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The results were very= interesting. The original thread is here
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
http://for= ums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979

And I have posted= the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at
=0A=0A=0A
=0A= =0Ahttp://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/
=

What I would love to add are any results with the newer= quadros (5000 / 6000) or any tesla card.
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
= Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about thei= r experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D (us= ing zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)

=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
The= amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last year and= I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. viewport a= ccuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a poor strat= egy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance in the 6xx = consumer cards.
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
Would also love to hear an= y thoughts on these results, I'll refrain from saying what I think until pe= ople get a chance to check it out.
-TG


= --
Animator & Editor
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0Awww.tedd= ygage.com
Brooklyn
=0A
=0A


<= br>
--
danny princz

exposedideas.com=0A
=0A
<= /div>


--
Ani= mator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
= =0A=0ABrooklyn
=0A
=0A

--958549312-1441811313-1366662344=:90112--