Return-Path: Received: from mail-da0-f48.google.com ([209.85.210.48] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5049922 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:09:05 +0200 Received: by mail-da0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f10so930118dak.35 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Q+3nIlsa2mweLq2V39HwXcEO3s9YYy2pFTM+zHe5sRY=; b=tFedhicEXiTgJaOAl659BK3yega/lX4QpqrphaQRGGzXq00scRGwTy5FmGaNoBhrm3 Hs7qK3+eMf6yN/hhPPOq5zCd28KLYJz80IBBmwcjJgd3m4sHodYBN5C7d1arOX6qQLv/ 13xPOKtJ7JzgewcAIVwopzwSgb9HJIr6xMemtCBs7pnsGtIpIueOhT8LwgybeSXuEm9i nUJlN9KKszKaOII6lz+5GsmFak3mRjxLI/G+TD5rVEt+9sBfgXk7EYlv/SUl43TI3p2g +P6eONjoRA93ZHXYWGqhVkCgQ3V0LnEtCaQXp8ziIWYNzKG7p1XXuSvcAL8/5l1yuUyJ KacQ== X-Received: by 10.68.232.42 with SMTP id tl10mr47816618pbc.72.1366816644786; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.2] (50-0-206-252.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [50.0.206.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa5sm3393656pbb.35.2013.04.24.08.17.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: OT Re: [AE] GH 3 lens recommendations From: Jim Feeley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:17:22 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) That 35-100 lens looks good, but note that in 35mm still terms, it's the = equivalent of a 70-200mm lens. A classic zoom, but long. A great second = or third lens perhaps? The Panasonic 12-35mm/f2.8 is rather nice and a very useful all-round = still and video lens (I've used one and will soon buy one). The Nokton = 25mm/f0.95 is lovely, too. I have a GH2. It's good for what it is. The GH3 has some noticeable = improvements, but fewer net gains for video. Jim On Apr 24, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Bruce Tovsky wrote: > hey emile! > i'm looking at the same camera, and this lens stood out from the pack: = Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 Lumix G Vario Zoom > a bit pricey, but spend on the lens as they say... > best > b