Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5049956 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:23:33 +0200 Received: from remote.animares.com (p578bf67e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.246.126]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LkBNy-1V5j0415hK-00c7Mk; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:31:54 +0200 Received: from SERVER.animares.local ([fe80::8533:d097:c65f:118a]) by SERVER.animares.local ([fe80::8533:d097:c65f:118a%14]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:31:49 +0200 From: Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH To: 'After Effects Mail List' Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks Thread-Topic: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchmarks Thread-Index: Ac5BAL4BsE3XuIHsRmq13lpZYAcpiQ== Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:31:48 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.0.27] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3E3144481D7374E92C779B8A339FA2099931ESERVERanimaresloc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:37qvy5loBpfqCPXtOpq0ZWnRZ0GHvJX/Ri/Mln1WWTv 8Z5eepbPgIQjqVelW307KLsA6uHCKS/G1Brqqx2XIiix8pSc4v z4KxkE/9P/p8Du+I7Hg9O7Wga8xlJ+IC/Z7qdV0DaloqHsbDTd JC17yAju3RPGYtvMFzI0WZdjRyY9z0XKoUPBL6UtzRCnEnlMQb udU/gcBh/l3vqhsEXbFZmi5ytCQPuDy5CT7ogsV/4RwSGGx2KP h4sGfLBRibIZIR5jms1hPMl9ncLtQK2ysITRUcDJiFhlYj2rWL bUPr+psDYpM8u+IwHRff1LpT6pyr8lN0W7f4wnQGj0mWz5yge9 3H9IXhgRfN+C6GxC2hTYkSyw5ASHNxyvGaHHZHEVpXCjmgy2yz UqjBOAXd/yc7ixOLeigq+Mq/cn2vikL4zTe1Ybcni4dG5XQxQG B92CV --_000_D3E3144481D7374E92C779B8A339FA2099931ESERVERanimaresloc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You are welcome ;-) -rodrigo . From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= rendernyc Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 05:21 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing= benchmarks cool, thanks for the info, I added it to the charts as well @ http://www.lo= opoutcontinue.com/CUDA/ On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH > wrote: I have following results: robot4JS.aep: Time 00:10:44 2x X5550 @ 2.67ghz, 48GB RAM, GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores CS6 11.1 RAYTRACE BENCHMARK.aep: Time:00:04:16 (new try) 2x X5550 @ 2.67ghz, 48GB RAM, GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores -rodrigo I have to post the file on my site still but here's a link https://www.dropbox.com/s/b0ixxyqths6eqdn/robot4JS.aep On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:11 AM, "Jim Tierney" > wrote: Ah. So many little hidden files... Thanks, that solved it. Results: i7-3770@3.4ghz, 8gb RAM, GTX Titan- Time: 00:04:0= 1 I'll post times for 690, 570, and Q4000 tomorrow. Cheers, Jim --------------- Jim Tierney President Digital Anarchy From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:53 AM To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing= benchmarks Hi Jim, first you have to copy the file 'raytracer_supported_cards.txt' on to the d= esktop. Then type this in the list of supported cards: GeForce GTX TITAN Save and copy that file back into the 'Support Files' folder. My titan works fine on CS6 / Win7. - rodrigo From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= Jim Tierney Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 07:37 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing= benchmarks Did you have any trouble getting AE to recognize the Titan? I'm just gettin= g 'incompatible device or driver'. :-\ (running Windows 8... which I d= on't recommend upgrading to) Drivers are updated, Premiere seems to recognize it (I listed it the suppor= ted_cards file), but AE is showing CUDA grayed out and won't use the GPU. N= ot sure what's up. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Cheers, Jim --------------- Jim Tierney President Digital Anarchy From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= Teddy Gage Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:19 PM To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing= benchmarks my project is available here http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ but obviously the results are different than Dan's bench On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich Young > wrote: Can we get the project to test ourselves? Rich --- On Mon, 4/22/13, rendernyc > wrote: From: rendernyc > Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing= benchmarks To: "After Effects Mail List" > Date: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:04 AM i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680. results are here http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/ On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Szabo Gergo > wrote: I would be curious about the results of the new iMacs mx680 card... Can amy= bod post a reszlt with that card? Thanks Gary Az iPhone k=E9sz=FCl=E9kemr=F5l k=FCldve 2013.04.21. d=E1tummal, 22:40 id=F5pontban Teddy Gage > =EDrta: So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow that h= as gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable spreads= heet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance of the = new titan card vs. last gen 5xx cards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted t= o see if the titan was worth the extra $1,000, because it is in fact a cons= umer version of the nvidia k20 tesla which costs over $3k. The results were= very interesting. The original thread is here http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979 And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my server at http://www.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/ What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / 600= 0) or any tesla card. Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about thei= r experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D (us= ing zbrush / maya / or C4D especially) The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last year = and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. viewpor= t accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a poor st= rategy to differentiate the quadros by gimping compute performance in the 6= xx consumer cards. Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrain from sa= ying what I think until people get a chance to check it out. -TG -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn -- danny princz exposedideas.com -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn -- danny princz exposedideas.com --_000_D3E3144481D7374E92C779B8A339FA2099931ESERVERanimaresloc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You are welcome ;-)=

 

-rodrigo

 

.

 

From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of rendernyc
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 05:21
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing benchma= rks

 

cool, thanks for the info, I added it to the charts = as well @ http://www.= loopoutcontinue.com/CUDA/

 

 

 

 

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Rodrigo Olmos | AN= IMA RES GmbH <rodrigo.olmos@animares.com> wrote:

I have following results:

 

robot4JS.aep: Time 00:10:44

2x X5550 @ 2.67ghz, 48GB RAM,= GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores

 

 

CS6 11.1 RAYTRACE BENCHMAR= K.aep: Time:00:04:16 (new try)

2x X5550 @ 2.67ghz, 48GB RAM,= GTX Titan 6GB, 2688 Cuda Cores

 

 

-rodrigo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have to post the file on my site still but here's a link 

 

Ah. So many little hidden files…<= /span>

 

Thanks, that solved it. Results:=

 

i7-3770@3.4ghz, 8gb RAM, GTX Titan-    Time= : 00:04:01

 

I’ll post times for 690, 570, and= Q4000 tomorrow.

 

 

Cheers,

Jim

--------------- 

Jim Tierney

President

Digital Anarchy

 

 

 

From: After Effects Mail Lis= t [mailto:AE-L= ist@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Olmos | ANIMA RES GmbH
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:53 AM
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan ray= tracing benchmarks

 

Hi Jim,

 

first you have to copy the file ‘raytr= acer_supported_cards.txt’ on to the desktop.

 

Then type this in the list of supported card= s:

GeForce GTX TITAN

 

Save and copy that file back into the ‘= ;Support Files’ folder.

 

My titan works fine on CS6 / Win7.

 

- rodrigo

 

 

 

From: After Effects Mail Lis= t [mailto:AE-L= ist@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Jim Tierney
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 07:37
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan ray= tracing benchmarks

 

Did you have any trouble getting AE to = recognize the Titan? I’m just getting ‘incompatible device or driver’.   :-\    (running Windows 8R= 30; which I don’t recommend upgrading to)

 

Drivers are updated, Premiere seems to = recognize it (I listed it the supported_cards file), but AE is showing CUDA grayed out and won’t use the GPU. Not sure what̵= 7;s up. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

 

 

Cheers,

Jim

--------------- 

Jim Tierney

President

Digital Anarchy

 

 

 

From: After Effects Mail Lis= t [mailto:AE-L= ist@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Teddy Gage
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:19 PM
To: After Effects Mail List
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan ray= tracing benchmarks

 

my project is available here
http://w= ww.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

but obviously the results are different than Dan's bench

 

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich Young <aefilter@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can we get the project to test ourselves?

Rich


--- On Mon, 4/22/13, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:


From: rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] yet another graphics cards thread - Titan raytracing= benchmarks
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Date: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:04 AM

i ran a different scene on the new imac with the 680.

results are here

 

 

 

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Szabo Gergo <formic.gergo@gma= il.com> wrote:

I would be curious about the results of the new iMacs mx680 card..= . Can amybod post a reszlt with that card?

 

Thanks

Gary

Az iPhone k=E9sz=FCl=E9kemr=F5l k=FCldve


2013.04.21. d=E1tummal, 22:40 id=F5pontban Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com= > =EDrta:

So a while ago I posted an AE graphic card benchmark at creative cow tha= t has gotten a lot of responses, so I threw together a quick, readable spre= adsheet of the results. I was mainly curious about compute performance of the new titan card vs. last gen 5xx c= ards and the kepler 6xx series. I wanted to see if the titan was worth the = extra $1,000, because it is in fact a consumer version of the nvidia k20 te= sla which costs over $3k. The results were very interesting. The original thread is here

http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120#1035979=

And I have posted the spreadsheets (and benchmark file) on my serv= er at

http://w= ww.teddygage.com/AEBENCHCS6/

 

What I would love to add are any results with the newer quadros (5000 / = 6000) or any tesla card.

Furthermore I'd be interested to hear any thoughts from 3D users about t= heir experiences using an AMD 7950 vs nvidia consumer card for viewport 3D = (using zbrush / maya / or C4D especially)

The amount of C4D work I've been doing has only increased in the last ye= ar and I can imagine when CS7 comes out that's only going to increase. view= port accuracy is going to be of a larger concern and nvidia is using a poor strategy to differentiate the quadros b= y gimping compute performance in the 6xx consumer cards.

Would also love to hear any thoughts on these results, I'll refrai= n from saying what I think until people get a chance to check it out.<= /o:p>

-TG



--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



 

--
danny princz

exposedideas.com =




--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn



 

--
danny princz

exposedideas.com

--_000_D3E3144481D7374E92C779B8A339FA2099931ESERVERanimaresloc_--