Return-Path: Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net ([208.80.4.156] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5049968 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:25:39 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E45B1CA077E for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:33:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net Received: from razortiemd-dt.razorandtie.com (unknown [65.223.213.2]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BB8E61CA0684 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: [AE] OT Re: [AE] GH 3 lens recommendations From: Bruce Tovsky In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:33:58 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <83BE5EFC-BDAC-4D22-9914-97CB7016E59F@skeletonhome.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) thanks for the tips jim! tough making decisions and doing math at the = same time. not being a real shooter - just an editor - every bit of info = helps! cheers b On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Jim Feeley wrote: > That 35-100 lens looks good, but note that in 35mm still terms, it's = the equivalent of a 70-200mm lens. A classic zoom, but long. A great = second or third lens perhaps? >=20 > The Panasonic 12-35mm/f2.8 is rather nice and a very useful all-round = still and video lens (I've used one and will soon buy one). The Nokton = 25mm/f0.95 is lovely, too. >=20 > I have a GH2. It's good for what it is. The GH3 has some noticeable = improvements, but fewer net gains for video. >=20 > Jim >=20 > On Apr 24, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Bruce Tovsky wrote: >=20 >> hey emile! >> i'm looking at the same camera, and this lens stood out from the = pack: Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 Lumix G Vario Zoom >> a bit pricey, but spend on the lens as they say... >> best >> b >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to