| ||||||||||
| thanks for the tips jim! tough making decisions and doing math at the same time. not being a real shooter - just an editor - every bit of info helps! cheers b On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Jim Feeley wrote: > That 35-100 lens looks good, but note that in 35mm still terms, it's the equivalent of a 70-200mm lens. A classic zoom, but long. A great second or third lens perhaps? > > The Panasonic 12-35mm/f2.8 is rather nice and a very useful all-round still and video lens (I've used one and will soon buy one). The Nokton 25mm/f0.95 is lovely, too. > > I have a GH2. It's good for what it is. The GH3 has some noticeable improvements, but fewer net gains for video. > > Jim > > On Apr 24, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Bruce Tovsky wrote: > >> hey emile! >> i'm looking at the same camera, and this lens stood out from the pack: Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 Lumix G Vario Zoom >> a bit pricey, but spend on the lens as they say... >> best >> b > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
