Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5053190 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 00:01:16 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id aq17so6279144iec.9 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=md1+5AiON4As5y9LKj5Zpe7FKPXIlh5GjQgXc+vwaAY=; b=CDTQhiVBp9LGYF3vPKsARNUq6EtWFNeU1t+VGuvuzSne/+Z0FbTxlv4vTutNZCoc3z 4TrI4YiZgaEXB2QQym6lxMzjCt87DVxi1CvgD0TuddYjHtUzdXWhB0sKDQrP5Ha7S3mI qLOKbEt9m+mRk4KBsmBzkRRWIBhG75F1Bxzvn0zjB1/tRwJ7zDXNH7M2Ly0++75QmJA3 V0kvFh3WHu8OO+WhlockCD2ACSH6Zxe1GF7KgT6YAMQtiHLZDXzjvYLeMdXmMPJxN1Sa 1PpFiJuyd85crD9udnva21lxJXXdr1JQVJpDI0X3s9VHDkUbQ2jskvkjqrPemzvUTvR0 acCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.72.69 with SMTP id b5mr2089130igv.105.1367100582510; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.7.194 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.7.194 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:09:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:09:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Simple AE Camera Question From: "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d8f1997c77504db5ee843 --047d7b5d8f1997c77504db5ee843 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. So do you mean duplicate comp, precompose, and then remove everything but the layer in question? On Apr 27, 2013 5:48 PM, "mylenium@mylenium.de" wrote: > ** > Such features would have to be explicitly implemented in the effects. > There's no way to influence that externally. Using a duplicate comp and > pre-composing therefore is your best bet to use Shapeshifter in a fixed > position. > > Mylenium > > [Pour Myl=E8ne, ange sur terre] > ----------------------------------------- > www.mylenium.de > > > "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" hat am 27. April 2013 um > 23:25 geschrieben: > > Hello all, > > Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not > use the camera? I want one layer to just stay put, while the other thing= s > move accordingly. Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using a layer > with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway. > > Thanks, > Eric > > > > --047d7b5d8f1997c77504db5ee843 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks.=A0 So do you mean duplicate comp, precompose, and th= en remove everything but the layer in question?

On Apr 27, 2013 5:48 PM, "mylenium@mylenium.de" <mylenium@mylenium.de> wrote:
=20
=20 =20 =20 =20
Such features would have to be explicitly implemented in the effects. Th= ere's no way to influence that externally. Using a duplicate comp and p= re-composing therefore is your best bet to use Shapeshifter in a fixed posi= tion.
=20
=A0
=20
Mylenium
=20
=A0
=20
[Pour Myl=E8ne, ange sur terre]
-----------------------------------------
www.mylenium.de=
=20
=A0
=20
"Mr. Eric D. Kirk" <kirkproductions@gmail.com> hat am 27. April = 2013 um 23:25 geschrieben:

Hello all,=20
=A0
=20
Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not = use the camera? =A0I want one layer to just stay put, while the other thing= s move accordingly. =A0Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using a= layer with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway.
=20
=A0
=20
Thanks,
Eric
=20
=20

=A0
=20
--047d7b5d8f1997c77504db5ee843--