Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5053225 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 00:37:31 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id to1so6059524ieb.39 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:45:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sCDmFtok6qtM28lkLD0jYCv+urE+OfuFpC2hn7/0zeA=; b=oo+1Ua4bmYluldv7QLd6cQ7DYePQReMfROpvBEuliU0GB970AaUrzkkdViDwAT80Os 8Y2iwa1L9F8TFwm8ugUOSF6GoyKkGmic2sEOTiX0NkmrxL+/9U2btuDDJWzSZIcgDsMY /XDGeW2rWz0p7UaDqK4vLXqAQdicaHUtlIS+VIC+z1qle6sh53d/jZRvM12bvLo5g+F5 6hXD9XfSmsZpWih6vQWjFdF4MF51GAZq8RCMKH+fIdaqgcrv35OoHob0UBT2R0oJMOCp KKcvOeK4gCUbPSlEfzqr//+8KJ3+aoRyQ/OTdJqU3iXf5TV+dU0Vj+iaTgwiFq99wVbR AvsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.112.6 with SMTP id im6mr4891450igb.17.1367102757724; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.7.194 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.7.194 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:45:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:45:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Simple AE Camera Question From: "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4141163ee9af04db5f6a68 --047d7b4141163ee9af04db5f6a68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Awesome. Thanks! On Apr 27, 2013 6:22 PM, "Phil Spitler" wrote: > Get the 3d layer in the position you want it then parent it to the camera, > I do this pretty often. > > If you want it to start being affected by the camera then all of a sudden > not be affected by the camera, have the layer not parented to the camera > until the frame you want it to freeze then split layers and parent the new > layer to the camera. > > Phil > > > > *Phil Spitler* | Creative Technologist | *Bonfire Labs* | t : > 415.394.8200 m : 415.571.3139 > > Website | Facebook > | LinkedIn > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote: > > Good question. I will try that. > On Apr 27, 2013 6:01 PM, "croebot@gmail.com" wrote: > >> Would parenting that layer to the camera work? It would appear to stay in >> one place because it would move with the camera. Sorry if I mis-understood >> the question. >> >> >> >> On Apr 27, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" < >> kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hello all, >> > >> > Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not >> use the camera? I want one layer to just stay put, while the other things >> move accordingly. Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using a layer >> with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Eric >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >> > > --047d7b4141163ee9af04db5f6a68 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Awesome.=A0 Thanks!

On Apr 27, 2013 6:22 PM, "Phil Spitler"= ; <phil@bonfirelabs.com> = wrote:
Get the 3d layer in the position you wa= nt it then parent it to the camera, I do this pretty often.

<= div>If you want it to start being affected by the camera then all of a sudd= en not be affected by the camera, have the layer not parented to the camera= until the frame you want it to freeze then split layers and parent the new= layer to the camera.

Phil



Phil Spitler=A0 |=A0 Creative Techno= logist =A0 |=A0=A0Bonfire Labs=A0 |=A0 t : 415.394.8200=A0 m : 415.571.313= 9

Website=A0|= =A0Facebook=A0|=A0LinkedIn





<= br>




On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote:

Good question.=A0 I will try that= .

On Apr 27, 2013 6:01 PM, "croebot@gmail.com" <croebot@gmail.com>= wrote:
Would parenting that layer to the camera work? It would appear to stay in o= ne place because it would move with the camera. Sorry if I mis-understood t= he question.



On Apr 27, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" <kirkproductions@gmail.com= > wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not= use the camera? =A0I want one layer to just stay put, while the other thin= gs move accordingly. =A0Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using = a layer with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

--047d7b4141163ee9af04db5f6a68--