Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5053242 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:32:56 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id to1so6073613ieb.25 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:41:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=J4zlJemQ1C1tpqK2AYpVdpcVM3b4A/JYIgiSW9RgkqY=; b=EdDR7v7yHqFkAHs6YRCM39G99Lf3ZTEXVmol2aLUxN528Smb/zcF+aFq1HBlyr/hzV +HonKMgZx0yDwvN23EYF/EXkSSK1BLnspk0MlowOT5xgw30m8S4/QbC6JRF7FCyqoVqq 8hE09UZHTAsXT8AMm2Ic6WvDWHzYVSjMFzXDm4ceA+Ddgp37Ial6ay08C6Urwn76hZpm T1ft5OgPLe5WEhkG+/raDg2a8C0q5OwMSa1MIMHshFIpgYQanmvGvTD3dOZ5oJwADbKy egwGUxPL58/DKk2Sh34Y1SM6Nq4E6YsAHkuPkIJl2Yrx00hQ4WJGH9l9YGCo7Qu3RMfz BxzA== X-Received: by 10.50.12.229 with SMTP id b5mr4802610igc.105.1367106082047; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:41:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.7.194 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:41:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:41:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Simple AE Camera Question To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340b49640ed604db603066 --14dae9340b49640ed604db603066 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ok, I have a follow up now. I parented the layer to the camera and it seems to fly all over before settling towards the end where I want it. Any idea what I might have done wrong? Thanks, Eric On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Phil Spitler wrote: > Get the 3d layer in the position you want it then parent it to the camera, > I do this pretty often. > > If you want it to start being affected by the camera then all of a sudden > not be affected by the camera, have the layer not parented to the camera > until the frame you want it to freeze then split layers and parent the new > layer to the camera. > > Phil > > > > *Phil Spitler* | Creative Technologist | *Bonfire Labs* | t : > 415.394.8200 m : 415.571.3139 > > Website | Facebook > | LinkedIn > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote: > > Good question. I will try that. > On Apr 27, 2013 6:01 PM, "croebot@gmail.com" wrote: > >> Would parenting that layer to the camera work? It would appear to stay in >> one place because it would move with the camera. Sorry if I mis-understood >> the question. >> >> >> >> On Apr 27, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" < >> kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hello all, >> > >> > Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not >> use the camera? I want one layer to just stay put, while the other things >> move accordingly. Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using a layer >> with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Eric >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >> > > -- Kirk Productions, Inc www.kirkproductions.com (recently updated!) kirkproductions@gmail.com IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ --14dae9340b49640ed604db603066 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, I have a follow up now. =A0I parented the layer to the camera and it se= ems to fly all over before settling towards the end where I want it. =A0Any= idea what I might have done wrong?

Thanks,
Eric
<= br>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Phil Spitler <phil@bonfirelabs.com> wrote:
Get the 3d layer in the position you wa= nt it then parent it to the camera, I do this pretty often.

<= div>If you want it to start being affected by the camera then all of a sudd= en not be affected by the camera, have the layer not parented to the camera= until the frame you want it to freeze then split layers and parent the new= layer to the camera.

Phil



Phil Spitler=A0 |=A0 Creative Techno= logist =A0 |=A0=A0Bonfire Labs=A0 |=A0 t : 415.394.8200=A0 m : 415.571.313= 9

Website=A0|= =A0Facebook=A0|=A0LinkedIn





<= br>




On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote:

Good question.=A0 I will try that= .

On Apr 27, 2013 6:01 PM, "croebot@gmail.com" <croebot@gmail.com>= wrote:
Would parenting that layer to the camera work? It would appear to stay in o= ne place because it would move with the camera. Sorry if I mis-understood t= he question.



On Apr 27, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" <kirkproductions@gmail.com= > wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not= use the camera? =A0I want one layer to just stay put, while the other thin= gs move accordingly. =A0Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using = a layer with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>




--
Kirk Productions, Inc
www.kirkproductions.com=A0(recen= tly updated!)
kirkproducti= ons@gmail.com
=A0
--14dae9340b49640ed604db603066--