Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-f177.google.com ([209.85.210.177] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5053244 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:39:29 +0200 Received: by mail-ia0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y26so4664746iab.22 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:47:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=2ggh+tlKLM/m/Gmlw8uLC0VTl0NP8tAELJVo5s16PyQ=; b=OvAjRLyBCPpx3pFrRVqPM5yXSJT07Z08tA8ooEzXt4oLn/+8wO1TB0QUKDl2Hvckuz lAWd0j8ZFH8CLUaXsTUOkGzF1xh/y/j00ArDBnsLQFXuAoe2aFzuLzVd0yliUPBL1C6o K6se7X8rN5K7kqCv7rxAF6dV9uBcDfdiDf9ylW4Px+xz2xYwsXWqkGLzro1Vaf5y5KdS MomAu4v7ojKkASm7jT7hFJvN0N03xiG5wB4fFiooR7yWQ7fWnzB4OQti3CCRZn34tUhh uOkaW5XuxE3DJdYzP0Lbrdoe41ZSjEPG5SjNarevuTXoGHFWozbQznS3kaPzR5DUsdoh dOsA== X-Received: by 10.50.112.6 with SMTP id im6mr4951237igb.17.1367106475408; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:47:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.7.194 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:47:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:47:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Simple AE Camera Question To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b414116d6439004db604743 --047d7b414116d6439004db604743 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well, I found a work around. I just placed my BG in a comp by itself and brought the main comp in to that and now it stays in place. But, I would like to know how to do it as you mentioned below. Thanks, Eric On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote: > Awesome. Thanks! > On Apr 27, 2013 6:22 PM, "Phil Spitler" wrote: > >> Get the 3d layer in the position you want it then parent it to the >> camera, I do this pretty often. >> >> If you want it to start being affected by the camera then all of a sudden >> not be affected by the camera, have the layer not parented to the camera >> until the frame you want it to freeze then split layers and parent the new >> layer to the camera. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> *Phil Spitler* | Creative Technologist | *Bonfire Labs* | t : >> 415.394.8200 m : 415.571.3139 >> >> Website | Facebook >> | LinkedIn >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote: >> >> Good question. I will try that. >> On Apr 27, 2013 6:01 PM, "croebot@gmail.com" wrote: >> >>> Would parenting that layer to the camera work? It would appear to stay >>> in one place because it would move with the camera. Sorry if I >>> mis-understood the question. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 27, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" < >>> kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello all, >>> > >>> > Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not >>> use the camera? I want one layer to just stay put, while the other things >>> move accordingly. Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using a layer >>> with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Eric >>> >>> +---End of message---+ >>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>> >> >> -- Kirk Productions, Inc www.kirkproductions.com (recently updated!) kirkproductions@gmail.com IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ --047d7b414116d6439004db604743 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, I found a work around. =A0I just placed my BG in a comp by itself and= brought the main comp in to that and now it stays in place. =A0But, I woul= d like to know how to do it as you mentioned below.

Than= ks,
Eric

On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Mr.= Eric D. Kirk <kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote:
=

Awesome.=A0 Thanks!

On Apr 27, 2013 6:22 PM, "Phil Spitler"= ; <phil@bonfir= elabs.com> wrote:
Get the 3d layer in the position you wa= nt it then parent it to the camera, I do this pretty often.

<= div>If you want it to start being affected by the camera then all of a sudd= en not be affected by the camera, have the layer not parented to the camera= until the frame you want it to freeze then split layers and parent the new= layer to the camera.

Phil



Phil Spitler=A0 |=A0 Creative Techno= logist =A0 |=A0=A0Bonfire Labs=A0 |=A0 t : 415.394.8200=A0 m : 415.571.313= 9

Website=A0|= =A0Facebook=A0|=A0LinkedIn





<= br>




On Apr 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk wrote:

Good question.=A0 I will try that= .

On Apr 27, 2013 6:01 PM, "croebot@gmail.com" <croebot@gmail.com>= wrote:
Would parenting that layer to the camera work? It would appear to stay in o= ne place because it would move with the camera. Sorry if I mis-understood t= he question.



On Apr 27, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" <kirkproductions@gmail.com= > wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know a quick way to tell a specific layer in a comp to not= use the camera? =A0I want one layer to just stay put, while the other thin= gs move accordingly. =A0Now, I know removing 3D is a way but I'm using = a layer with Shapeshifter applied so, it will use the camera anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>




--
Kirk Pr= oductions, Inc
www.kirkproductions.com=A0(recently updated!)
kirkproductions@gmail.com<= /div>
=A0
--047d7b414116d6439004db604743--