Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5063779 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 07 May 2013 23:03:31 +0200 Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ma3so695636pbc.35 for ; Tue, 07 May 2013 14:12:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OpoueEJF2iycO17RqRC6JAPexc2iSwgn/8cKWcCn518=; b=Wly1mSSiraBae47ckXhzPWcPXrwW6kmmPU/5wjYbazXms+iWwrctukB++Fp9tWBZbA vWTKTFoF/ag6PpublPiwywh+m/xorfL/kwnM7RG2tYAB5x/WDyBesf8TpkP+jYg281ET PhvQ4A9I6H3qgR8dUsAlu8Spnbe3qwtyrIuAmwd8JYVl3nsK5Ka1pH1TSfole8n7Cmzq mujGWOX8lHpsUcIi/4FQufxUNPqgGssG1jpS9FmflejlkMQ+zC/kxpegWSpOzyHCmTKz 4AExJmg4BxbpoSTYT+HDlvVFhT96P1azplpxdREv9HC7ENrPFwt5srr44HAExNSnAH/1 Ry+g== X-Received: by 10.68.44.169 with SMTP id f9mr4314520pbm.29.1367961135797; Tue, 07 May 2013 14:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [198.18.39.232] ([12.145.98.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm713997pbm.0.2013.05.07.14.12.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 May 2013 14:12:14 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:12:07 -0700 Subject: Re: [AE] CS is DEAD From: Steve Forde To: After Effects Mail List Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [AE] CS is DEAD In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I want to respond to this directly as I have seen a lot of this FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt). Frankly, this is nothing but idle fear mongering. A subscription model has zero incentive to jack prices over time as it then introduces a strong barrier to entry for new customers. If you live in the US - go to a Verizon or AT&T store - and see if you think entry prices have gone up over the last 10 years. They haven't. Sure there's been say new services or devices that cost extra - but the base cost of the platform in fact usually goes down - NOT up. As for what we at Adobe have in store downstream, I can't comment - but I will state that we are highly motivated to provide value via Creative Cloud, hence the many promotions with discounts we run as incentive to join it. S. On 5/7/13 8:58 AM, "Dann Stubbs" wrote: >also this whole "cloud" thing is very flexible - like once adobe finds >90% of it's user base transitioned (via no other option) on "cloud" there >is not much to stop that $49 monthly fee from going to $249 per month, >though it will probably go up in smaller steps, $79, $99, $129 etc - this >is like printing money at that point - need to increase revenues to get >that fat bonus? let's up the monthly "cloud" price - after all the >"users" will HAVE to pay it now or their apps go poof and they loose >access to all their data/files (insert evil laugh "moo hoo haa haa" here)