Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5063839 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 07 May 2013 23:51:33 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ar20so2015337iec.11 for ; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:00:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=7CeuUWXeqSZhhcMWTMvcF9EYqKSSuYLRtaT/lALXmj4=; b=BZN/bHUTh7lTRxMt8LOrUe10LBTVk4zKueEy7BsKGvDHuXRagCQibHWSgg6dcJ3IpA dGz5zau0kPBSXm1Usnsw9MX/p7M11OBR7sjLQGckwwSILfvvQ9C+QJlXuYbC1/9vBKnU Nnn6ZFxaFeraxRbrQv8rrH7CBhFjRJkaKqAKUgNEUu9LGqmQNF3b3RJOJyloE6pjxJLA KYmkIdQbr+Z/6KO9CCoMLbktgVW44ULyuoCywHSC/R2jdptKn6EBz7Yn+2EepEjhuXhV T0jbto1byLerGPqnfH57qfE9ncY2Z8NDpABoQIt8MaXNMWdqqYmJgFgc7wsTCL5/SVwm 2Fow== X-Received: by 10.50.114.161 with SMTP id jh1mr1390225igb.112.1367964018416; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [97.249.204.183] (183.sub-97-249-204.myvzw.com. [97.249.204.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y5sm1653160igg.7.2013.05.07.15.00.16 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 May 2013 15:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [AE] CS is DEAD References: From: Rendernyc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <2C616777-A7F3-49E6-BBAE-C3387E84917C@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 18:00:12 -0400 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Notice how healthcare premiums go up by large percentages every year? On May 7, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Dann Stubbs wrote: > hi steve >=20 > since i made comment on concern over future price increases as my "theory= " i am glad to see your reply >=20 > but i will save your email as well, and we'll see what happens i guess... b= ecause as far as i can tell - there is no real basis behind saying it won't g= o up and calling it FUD - product manager or not, i don't think that tier ma= kes the pricing decisions, in fact it's probably more of a committee and we a= ll know how rational those are right? adobe has stock, they have shareholder= s, and that means profits, increases in profits or bad projections for the s= hareholders. >=20 > the reason ATT and Verizon etc have not raised their prices it they can't b= ecause of competition - something that adobe it quite lacking at the moment f= rom my perspective. >=20 > adobe and others like microsoft are essentially killing (often via buying u= p their competition) of course there is always the chance they won't, and su= re it may not, but if they won't have adobe put a statement on the price wil= l NOT go up. of course they won't do that... but things are getting more exp= ensive, insurance for employees, electricity, food, catering, executive comp= ensation does have a habit of going up and not staying the same etc... money= , money, money... there is a finite market for every product - even adobe ap= ps. >=20 > if they don't raise prices then good for us the consumer! yay! i will rejo= ice along with all the others, but until then someone being concerned and ex= pressing valid concerns about future price increases once they are "locked o= n board" is as viable an opinion to me as someone else saying that there wil= l NOT be price increases "just because" >=20 > have a great evening, >=20 > dann > ___________________________________________________________________ >=20 > Dann Stubbs - dann@darkskydigital.com > Dark Sky Digital - http://www.darkskydigital.com >=20 > http://www.RenderKing.com Value Priced C4D, VRAY Render Farm > ___________________________________________________________________ >=20 >=20 >=20 > On May 7, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Steve Forde wrote: >=20 >> I want to respond to this directly as I have seen a lot of this FUD (Fear= , >> Uncertainty and Doubt). Frankly, this is nothing but idle fear mongering.= >>=20 >> A subscription model has zero incentive to jack prices over time as it >> then introduces a strong barrier to entry for new customers. If you live= >> in the US - go to a Verizon or AT&T store - and see if you think entry >> prices have gone up over the last 10 years. They haven't. >>=20 >> Sure there's been say new services or devices that cost extra - but the >> base cost of the platform in fact usually goes down - NOT up. >>=20 >> As for what we at Adobe have in store downstream, I can't comment - but I= >> will state that we are highly motivated to provide value via Creative >> Cloud, hence the many promotions with discounts we run as incentive to >> join it. >>=20 >> S. >>=20 >> On 5/7/13 8:58 AM, "Dann Stubbs" wrote: >>=20 >>> also this whole "cloud" thing is very flexible - like once adobe finds >>> 90% of it's user base transitioned (via no other option) on "cloud" ther= e >>> is not much to stop that $49 monthly fee from going to $249 per month, >>> though it will probably go up in smaller steps, $79, $99, $129 etc - thi= s >>> is like printing money at that point - need to increase revenues to get >>> that fat bonus? let's up the monthly "cloud" price - after all the >>> "users" will HAVE to pay it now or their apps go poof and they loose >>> access to all their data/files (insert evil laugh "moo hoo haa haa" here= ) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to