Return-Path: Received: from [72.52.194.27] (HELO diamond.tritoncore.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5063879 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 08 May 2013 00:31:00 +0200 Received: from 50-0-121-187.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net ([50.0.121.187]:44083 helo=[10.0.1.40]) by diamond.tritoncore.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UZqXx-0007gn-HA for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 07 May 2013 18:39:46 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: [AE] Best AE Render Settings for Long Footage From: patrick Siemer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:39:44 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - diamond.tritoncore.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gmail.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: diamond.tritoncore.com: authenticated_id: patrick@tapeandglue.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: I agree...DNX HD, or Pro-res or Photo Jpeg compressors are super fast. = Not as small as H264, but quality is great. patrick siemer On May 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Steve Oakley wrote: > the answer is, it depends. maybe you are doing stuff that requires = that long to render and the encode part is a minimal part of it.=20 >=20 > is your storage fast enough ?=20 >=20 > do you have MP enabled ? and have enough RAM for what you are = rendering ? >=20 > have enough cores ? >=20 > what are your render settings ? HQ / draft, Full / 1/2 / 1/4 res ? = Motion blur on ? >=20 > personally I'd probably output DNxHD 145 or ProRes LT unless you need = to push the file across the net on a slower connection. even then it = might be faster to output a ProRes file, then encode to h.264 >=20 > S >=20 >=20 > On May 7, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk = wrote: >=20 >> Hey Todd, >>=20 >> You should be the expert here and to change subject a bit from that = cloud discussion - I am rendering just a draft of a feature length = movie (about 70 mins). I need it fast, low res, just for a rough cut. >>=20 >> What do you recommend? I could even go 640x480. >>=20 >> Appreciate it. Right now, I'm rendering 130K frames .mov, h264 and = it looks like over 20 hours. >>=20 >> Thanks >>=20 >> Eric >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to