| ||||||||||
| I agree...DNX HD, or Pro-res or Photo Jpeg compressors are super fast. Not as small as H264, but quality is great. patrick siemer On May 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Steve Oakley wrote: > the answer is, it depends. maybe you are doing stuff that requires that long to render and the encode part is a minimal part of it. > > is your storage fast enough ? > > do you have MP enabled ? and have enough RAM for what you are rendering ? > > have enough cores ? > > what are your render settings ? HQ / draft, Full / 1/2 / 1/4 res ? Motion blur on ? > > personally I'd probably output DNxHD 145 or ProRes LT unless you need to push the file across the net on a slower connection. even then it might be faster to output a ProRes file, then encode to h.264 > > S > > > On May 7, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk <kirkproductions@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey Todd, >> >> You should be the expert here and to change subject a bit from that cloud discussion - I am rendering just a draft of a feature length movie (about 70 mins). I need it fast, low res, just for a rough cut. >> >> What do you recommend? I could even go 640x480. >> >> Appreciate it. Right now, I'm rendering 130K frames .mov, h264 and it looks like over 20 hours. >> >> Thanks >> >> Eric > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
