Return-Path: Received: from dub0-omc4-s27.dub0.hotmail.com ([157.55.2.102] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5067107 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 11 May 2013 15:05:06 +0200 Received: from DUB112-DS39 ([157.55.2.73]) by dub0-omc4-s27.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 11 May 2013 06:13:59 -0700 X-TMN: [eo1/5LCxRxsHluRmRp1cQvlRpiLI79wB] X-Originating-Email: [sundstedt@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Return-Path: sundstedt@hotmail.com Reply-To: "Anders Sundstedt" From: "Anders Sundstedt" To: "After Effects Mail List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [AE] AE CS6 vs CS5.5 render speed Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 14:13:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006E_01CE4E51.C80F5A90" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2013 13:13:59.0392 (UTC) FILETIME=[6629D600:01CE4E49] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006E_01CE4E51.C80F5A90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rik, I totally agree. It would be great if BGRender or something equal = was available in AE CS6/CC as a default plug-in/render option. Easy = enough to use BGRender though it=E2=80=99s the best. Lloyd if you read = this you are awesome your BG Render Script is great. Thanks, - Anders From: rik bogusz=20 Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:27 PM To: After Effects Mail List=20 Subject: Re: [AE] AE CS6 vs CS5.5 render speed BGRender is essential. can't recommend it enough. =20 On May 10, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: Also, look at Lloyd's BG Render script. This is the fastest way to = render and will out perform CS6 mp renders every time, plus it renders = in the background, which is a nice bonus. Jack Tunnicliffe=20 Java Post Production ___ On May 10, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Peter Litwinowicz = wrote: Just making sure: Are you using 11.0.2 and not the 11.0 or 11.0.1 version of AE CS6? = At one point in the not-too-distant past I found the Adobe site still = had previous installers on the website (as part of the Production = Premium download, in my case).=20 So if you are using a trial version, make sure that you install the = latest updates from Adobe. Pete From: Terry Barnum Reply-To: After Effects Mail List Date: Friday, May 10, 2013 2:47 PM To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] AE CS6 vs CS5.5 render speed Is anyone else currently experiencing slower renders in CS6 versus = CS5? I'm trying to get to the bottom of this because we'd really like to = use CS6 but the render speed makes it impractical. Thanks, -Terry On May 8, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Terry Barnum wrote: I'm seeing a significant slow down in AE CS6 vs CS5.5 reders. Lots = of google hits about this last year but not many currently. Todd, I = followed your blog posting on RAM assignment and core scheduling but it = didn't seem to get me back to CS5.5 render speeds. MacPro 12 core, OS X 10.7.5, 2.66GHz, 32GB RAM, SSD = boot/application disk. CS6 updated to latest with these AE RAM and Multiprocessing prefs: 8GB RAM for other apps 24GB for CS 8 cores for other apps 3GB per core 6 cores for AE It's a credit roll with a pre-rendered motion background and PIP = of outtakes/bloopers. The PIP has a lens effect, drop shadow and color = tint. Output is a 23.976 ProRes 422HQ QT onto a Fibre Channel disk. In CS5.5, this project renders to the Fibre disk in 21 min. Rendering this same project in CS6 takes ~70 min. Are the above settings okay? What else should I be looking at? I'm = happy to provide other details. Thanks, -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com +---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to ------=_NextPart_000_006E_01CE4E51.C80F5A90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rik, I totally agree. It would be great if BGRender or something = equal was=20 available in AE CS6/CC as a default plug-in/render option. Easy enough = to use=20 BGRender though it=E2=80=99s the best. Lloyd if you read this you are = awesome your BG=20 Render Script is great.

Thanks,
- Anders
 
From: rik bogusz
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AE] AE CS6 vs CS5.5 render = speed
 
BGRender=20 is essential. can't recommend it enough. =20
 
 
On May 10, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe <jack@javapost.ca> = wrote:
Also,=20 look at Lloyd's BG Render script. This is the fastest way to render = and will=20 out perform CS6 mp renders every time, plus it renders in the = background,=20 which is a nice bonus.

Jack = Tunnicliffe=20
Java Post Production
___
=
 
 
On May 10, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Peter Litwinowicz <pete@revisionfx.com> = wrote:
Just making sure:
Are you using 11.0.2 and not the 11.0 or 11.0.1 version of AE=20 CS6?  At one point in the not-too-distant past I found the = Adobe site=20 still had previous installers on the website (as part of the = Production=20 Premium download, in my case).
 
So if you are using a trial version, make sure that you install = the=20 latest updates from Adobe.
Pete
 
 
From: Terry Barnum <terry@dop.com>
Reply-To: After Effects Mail List = <AE-List@media-motion.tv>Date: Friday, May 10, 2013 2:47 = PM
To: After Effects Mail List = <AE-List@media-motion.tv>Subject: Re: [AE] AE CS6 vs CS5.5 = render=20 speed
 
Is anyone else currently experiencing slower renders in CS6 = versus CS5?=20 I'm trying to get to the bottom of this because we'd really like to = use CS6=20 but the render speed makes it impractical.
 
Thanks,
-Terry
 
On May 8, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Terry Barnum wrote:
 
I'm seeing a significant slow down in AE CS6 vs CS5.5 reders. = Lots of=20 google hits about this last year but not many currently. Todd, I = followed=20 your blog posting on RAM assignment and core scheduling but it = didn't seem=20 to get me back to CS5.5 render speeds.
MacPro 12 core, OS X 10.7.5, 2.66GHz, 32GB RAM, SSD = boot/application=20 disk.
CS6 updated to latest with these AE RAM and Multiprocessing=20 prefs:
8GB RAM for other apps
24GB for CS
8 cores for other apps
3GB per core
6 cores for AE
It's a credit roll with a pre-rendered motion background and = PIP of=20 outtakes/bloopers. The PIP has a lens effect, drop shadow and = color tint.=20 Output is a 23.976 ProRes 422HQ QT onto a Fibre Channel = disk.
In CS5.5, this project renders to the Fibre disk in 21 = min.
Rendering this same project in CS6 takes ~70 min.
Are the above settings okay? What else should I be looking = at? I'm=20 happy to provide other details.
Thanks,
-Terry
 
Terry Barnum
digital OutPost
 
 
+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_006E_01CE4E51.C80F5A90--